Normal
he is an autist. He started sperging as soon as thomist said the Cappadocians are scholastic which is a basic error tbh, I have watched many dyer videos and as soon as his opponent makes an error he starts sperging at them as a gotcha, but as annoying as his sperging is the thomist guy did make an error that made him look ignorant. Im just saying we need actually trained defenders of the faith that are not just reading primary sources and aquinas, they need to have an actual education on philosophy and theology to be able to avoid obvious errors.His ending own of I know the exact source of this quote has no relation to the actual debate as well, just because you know the source of the information does not mean you have a proper interpretation or understanding of the text. Example being prots reading the bible just being able to quote chapter and verse does not prove you have the correct interpretation.
he is an autist. He started sperging as soon as thomist said the Cappadocians are scholastic which is a basic error tbh, I have watched many dyer videos and as soon as his opponent makes an error he starts sperging at them as a gotcha, but as annoying as his sperging is the thomist guy did make an error that made him look ignorant. Im just saying we need actually trained defenders of the faith that are not just reading primary sources and aquinas, they need to have an actual education on philosophy and theology to be able to avoid obvious errors.
His ending own of I know the exact source of this quote has no relation to the actual debate as well, just because you know the source of the information does not mean you have a proper interpretation or understanding of the text. Example being prots reading the bible just being able to quote chapter and verse does not prove you have the correct interpretation.
