Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="SowiesoGroyp" data-source="post: 25432" data-attributes="member: 6">to modify this slightly after thinking about it more, i think it's more like: latinxes are broadly poor and &quot;working class&quot; -- they are mostly kind of broke, so inflation and &quot;grocery prices&quot; stuff hits them way harder. and since they aren't seething with hatred for Whites in the way that niggers are, there's nothing in their brains that blocks them from considering voting for republicans. i don't have data on this offhand, but i get the impression that even asians are more anti-White than latinxes (and that's on top of the economic status of asians being more similar to college-educated Whites, thus inculcating them into elitist liberal culture, whereas the economic status of latinxes is similar to non-college-educated Whites).this is an unfortunate development because it'll make White Nationalism a harder sell to normie republicans going forward. the easiest formulation of Great Replacement theory is talking about mass immigration leading to political changes (securing a one-party state for dems). on the other hand, maybe i shouldn't even be thinking about majoritarian strategies anymore, so none of this matters. plus, a meritocratic immigration system would probably block out 90% of migrant latinxes on IQ grounds, so even if White republicans were constantly brofisting latinxes, we can mostly control the latinx problem by doing basic MAGA stuff, which doesn't require republicans to become &quot;racist&quot;: stopping illegal immigration (uncontroversial), doing mass deportations (uncontroversial) and ending irrational family-based policies (justifiable without invoking &quot;racism&quot;). &quot;racism&quot; is only really required to avoid creating a canadian/australian-style immigration policy. (i do think there is a way to create policy that ends up excluding almost all nonwhites without saying anything about race, but that's another matter...)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="SowiesoGroyp, post: 25432, member: 6"] to modify this slightly after thinking about it more, i think it's more like: latinxes are broadly poor and "working class" -- they are mostly kind of broke, so inflation and "grocery prices" stuff hits them way harder. and since they aren't seething with hatred for Whites in the way that niggers are, there's nothing in their brains that blocks them from considering voting for republicans. i don't have data on this offhand, but i get the impression that even asians are more anti-White than latinxes (and that's on top of the economic status of asians being more similar to college-educated Whites, thus inculcating them into elitist liberal culture, whereas the economic status of latinxes is similar to non-college-educated Whites). this is an unfortunate development because it'll make White Nationalism a harder sell to normie republicans going forward. the easiest formulation of Great Replacement theory is talking about mass immigration leading to political changes (securing a one-party state for dems). on the other hand, maybe i shouldn't even be thinking about majoritarian strategies anymore, so none of this matters. plus, a meritocratic immigration system would probably block out 90% of migrant latinxes on IQ grounds, so even if White republicans were constantly brofisting latinxes, we can mostly control the latinx problem by doing basic MAGA stuff, which doesn't require republicans to become "racist": stopping illegal immigration (uncontroversial), doing mass deportations (uncontroversial) and ending irrational family-based policies (justifiable without invoking "racism"). "racism" is only really required to avoid creating a canadian/australian-style immigration policy. (i do think there is a way to create policy that ends up excluding almost all nonwhites without saying anything about race, but that's another matter...) [/QUOTE]

Verification