Video version of article: https://youtu.be/lGGqoxdtw00
In 1978 and 1979, Hillary Clinton managed to trade cattle futures so successfully that she made over 10,000% on her initial investment of $1000. This is remarkable on a number of levels. First off, she was new to trading and had no formal trading. She is, if not the most talented, one of the luckiest traders in the whole world. Let’s take a look at how Hillary managed to so effortlessly make so much money in under ten months.
When first starting out trading, people are often advised to trade on paper without risking real money. This is to minimize any the inevitable losses of a beginner trying to trade. The futures market is an extremely fickle and dangerous beast, and very few experienced people are able to make consistent monetary gains. So when the First Lady of Arkansas, with many political connections, makes a boatload of money, eyebrows tend to get raised. I’m sure that all her connections didn’t have any factor in her success.
Just for kicks, let’s take a look at Hillary’s trading advisors at that time. One of them was James Blair, a lawyer. Coincidentally, he also provided outside council to Tyson Foods. Tyson Foods is a pretty big company. I wonder what they sell. Oh look, chicken wings and French fries. Nothing much to see here. Oh wait, they sell beef too? Wow, what a coincidence that Hillary was trading cattle futures with people who had connections to a cattle company! Who did James Blair trade through? A guy named Robert Bone. Well, it turns out that Bone was a Refco (more on that later) broker. He was also a former Tyson executive. Another funny connection to potential insider information in the very industry that Hillary was trading in.
So we know about Robert Bone and how he worked for Refco. Let’s learn a bit about Refco to see what type of trading company it was. After all, in an industry plagued by insider trading and fraud, it’s important to see whose services Mrs. Clinton utilized. Refco, a fairly typical trading firm seems to not be operating any more. It seems that in late 2005, it was discovered that the CEO, Phillip R. Bennett, had hidden over $400 million dollars in bad debt. Upon further investigation, it turned out that Bennet had been funneling money through an entity that was controlled by himself.
Sure, there’s been a few bad actors in Refco in the recent past. Hasn’t every company had a scandal or two involving millions of dollars? Let’s look back and see if there are any other problems that pop up. It turns out that in 2001, Refco was ordered to pay over $40 million after one of its brokers cleared trades with fake order tickets. Also, in early 2005, the company was implicated in a scam known as naked short selling of a company’s stock. I guess Refco isn’t exactly a squeaky clean company after all. Now that we’ve established the trustworthiness of the brokerage firm that Hillary used, let’s get back to the meat of the story. Just how amazing was the future first lady’s trading?
The majority of people who try trading (stock or futures market) win some but end up losing a lot more. Traders often either end up broke or quit after realizing the futility of trying to time the market. New traders are by far the majority of the financial losers, as they are not used to the irrationality of the market. Hillary, against the odds, managed to pull off an 80% profitable trade rate. She wasn’t a grizzled veteran either. Hillary was either extremely lucky, skilled, or had insider info. As we all know, the Clintons have a squeaky clean track record so the third option is definitely not possible.
I’m sure Hillary is just a very talented and empowered womyn. After all, the fact that the brokerage firm she used has been involved in multiple scandals shouldn’t cause us to do a double take. The fact that her trading advisors most likely had insider connections to the market she was trading in shouldn’t raise concerns. Just because economists at the Universities of North Florida and Auburn state that the odds of Hillary’s trading success were at best 1 in 31 trillion, we shouldn’t mistrust Hillary. Just for a better picture of the previous statistic, an individual being struck by lightning is 41 MILLION times more likely to happen than Hillary pulling off the feat that she did. I’m sure this is the case of an extremely skilled woman. With an honest woman this gifted with handling money, it would be a crime not to put her in charge of our economy. I’m not a sexist pig. I’m voting to put this exceptional woman in control of the most powerful country on earth.
#Hillary2016
Video version of article: https://youtu.be/lGGqoxdtw00
In 1978 and 1979, Hillary Clinton managed to trade cattle futures so successfully that she made over 10,000% on her initial investment of $1000. This is remarkable on a number of levels. First off, she was new to trading and had no formal trading. She is, if not the most talented, one of the luckiest traders in the whole world. Let’s take a look at how Hillary managed to so effortlessly make so much money in under ten months.
In order to grasp the totality of the situation, let’s get a brief (and admittedly shallow) understanding of the stock market. With the stock market, you buy and sell small pieces of a company in an attempt to make money. People buy stocks when they thing its price will rise, and sell when they think its price will fall. Shorting is another aspect to the stock market. When shorting, a trader essentially bets that the stock is going to lower in price. This allows people to make money on stocks losing value. To further increase potential monetary gains, a trader can margin trade. Margin trading essentially equates borrowing money from a broker to increase the amount of stock you can purchase. This increases the risk however, because the ticking time bomb of debt is now involved. As volatile and unpredictable as the stock market is, the futures market is even wilder. In the futures market, traders have less flexibility when to buy and sell.
When first starting out trading, people are often advised to trade on paper without risking real money. This is to minimize any the inevitable losses of a beginner trying to trade. The futures market is an extremely fickle and dangerous beast, and very few experienced people are able to make consistent monetary gains. So when the First Lady of Arkansas, with many political connections, makes a boatload of money, eyebrows tend to get raised. I’m sure that all her connections didn’t have any factor in her success.
Just for kicks, let’s take a look at Hillary’s trading advisors at that time. One of them was James Blair, a lawyer. Coincidentally, he also provided outside council to Tyson Foods. Tyson Foods is a pretty big company. I wonder what they sell. Oh look, chicken wings and French fries. Nothing much to see here. Oh wait, they sell beef too? Wow, what a coincidence that Hillary was trading cattle futures with people who had connections to a cattle company! Who did James Blair trade through? A guy named Robert Bone. Well, it turns out that Bone was a Refco (more on that later) broker. He was also a former Tyson executive. Another funny connection to potential insider information in the very industry that Hillary was trading in.
So we know about Robert Bone and how he worked for Refco. Let’s learn a bit about Refco to see what type of trading company it was. After all, in an industry plagued by insider trading and fraud, it’s important to see whose services Mrs. Clinton utilized. Refco, a fairly typical trading firm seems to not be operating any more. It seems that in late 2005, it was discovered that the CEO, Phillip R. Bennett, had hidden over $400 million dollars in bad debt. Upon further investigation, it turned out that Bennet had been funneling money through an entity that was controlled by himself.
Sure, there’s been a few bad actors in Refco in the recent past. Hasn’t every company had a scandal or two involving millions of dollars? Let’s look back and see if there are any other problems that pop up. It turns out that in 2001, Refco was ordered to pay over $40 million after one of its brokers cleared trades with fake order tickets. Also, in early 2005, the company was implicated in a scam known as naked short selling of a company’s stock. I guess Refco isn’t exactly a squeaky clean company after all. Now that we’ve established the trustworthiness of the brokerage firm that Hillary used, let’s get back to the meat of the story. Just how amazing was the future first lady’s trading?
The majority of people who try trading (stock or futures market) win some but end up losing a lot more. Traders often either end up broke or quit after realizing the futility of trying to time the market. New traders are by far the majority of the financial losers, as they are not used to the irrationality of the market. Hillary, against the odds, managed to pull off an 80% profitable trade rate. She wasn’t a grizzled veteran either. Hillary was either extremely lucky, skilled, or had insider info. As we all know, the Clintons have a squeaky clean track record so the third option is definitely not possible.
I’m sure Hillary is just a very talented and empowered womyn. After all, the fact that the brokerage firm she used has been involved in multiple scandals shouldn’t cause us to do a double take. The fact that her trading advisors most likely had insider connections to the market she was trading in shouldn’t raise concerns. Just because economists at the Universities of North Florida and Auburn state that the odds of Hillary’s trading success were at best 1 in 31 trillion, we shouldn’t mistrust Hillary. Just for a better picture of the previous statistic, an individual being struck by lightning is 41 MILLION times more likely to happen than Hillary pulling off the feat that she did. I’m sure this is the case of an extremely skilled woman. With an honest woman this gifted with handling money, it would be a crime not to put her in charge of our economy. I’m not a sexist pig. I’m voting to put this exceptional woman in control of the most powerful country on earth.
#Hillary2016
Potential Connection to GamerGate and Gates Foundation
Late last year, the web lit up with controversy. Out of the blue, articles across multiple gaming sites were posted bearing the same message. They told the reader that gaming can’t be just for straight white males. They explained that the current gamer is an angry, basement dwelling nerd living in his parents’ basement. The core gaming community reacted in collective shock, as the claims were provably false.
Containing over 150 writers, the mailing list was another piece of damning evidence towards the conclusion that Games and Tech Press are working towards a common interest. Inspired by Kyle Orland of ArsTechnica (a rather shabby tech news publication), GJP shows pressure being put on people to write stories in an unnaturally favorable context.
As colluding groups of semi-powerful people have the tendency to push certain agendas, it can be interesting to look the connections of the members. One such connection is Kyle Orland’s own father, Martin Orland. Martin has quite a few interesting connections .
It turns out that Martin is a Senior Program Director for “Evaluation and Policy Research” at WestEd, a big corporation with government ties. He is also a Director of the Mid-Atlantic Comprehensive Center for the U.S. Department of Education. According to WestEd’s own site, Martin Orland directs a nationwide staff of scientists and “content experts” to address “critical needs” in “education and human development”.
Before Orland joined WestEd, he served as Director of the Center for Education at the National Research Council, part of the National Academies. He also held several senior leadership positions at the U.S. Department of Education and the National Education Goals Panel. Orland has authored a number of publications both for academic journals and government, and has regularly presented at international, national, and regional conferences. Was the president of the Association for Education Finance and Policy, and is currently on the Editorial Board for the Journal of Education Finance and Policy. That’s pretty connected.
All of this is well and good, but what does it have to do with GameJournoPros and the current state of games media? It seems that the current push for “diversity” and politically correct messages in video games may be part of a larger goal.
It turns out that Martin Orland may be connected to the Gates Foundation. When Orland became the director for WestEd, grants from Bill Gate’s foundation began to show up. WestEd received just under 3 million dollars in the course of two years.
Then, one day they received one grant of about $3.5 Million. That day was just one day before all of the suspiciously similar “Gamers are Dead” articles were released. The grant was also misfiled, which made it harder to track down. Sure, these could be coincidences, but they all seem to be just a bit convenient. Could it be that there is a larger agenda going on?
Let’s take a brief look at the Gates Foundation to see if we can garner any morsels of truth. In this fascinating article on Slashdot (archive link ), the Gates Foundation is described as having a strategy in place when they want to create certain laws. The article describes how they “produce a crisis” in order to “galvanize action”. This strategy was employed, with the help of places “like Code.org and FWD.us … to create a national K-12 CS and tech immigration crisis”.
This strategy of creating a crisis fits shockingly well with the ongoing smear campaign against gamers. Formerly mainstream sites like Polygon and Kotaku have ramped up posting articles criticizing the “lack of inclusivity and diversity” in gaming, a patently false claim to anyone near the industry. This narrative has been pushed in tandem with concepts such as “gamification” being needed in education. One has to wonder if we are seeing an attempt by politicians to gain censorial control over yet another form of media.
The parallels between the admittedly manufactured tech crisis and gaming diversity crisis are quite interesting. Non-profits popped up to help push for more tech education shortly after the “crisis” was mainstream. Now, we have this supposed inclusivity problem in gaming and up pops a non-profit (Feminist Frequency ) to further push the meme. Even better, any criticism of FemFreq’s work is hand waved away by the “journalists” as sexism.
What does this all mean? To be frank, nothing for certain. All these connections and coincidences could be flukes, or they could be part of a larger tapestry. It does give one cause to dig a little deeper into the corruption of the game industry.
Donald Trump is Adolf Hitler
01-12-2015
Don’t be a fan of Donald Trump. He’s a crypto-Nazi. Don’t believe it? You aren’t looking close enough.
Did you know that Hitler was white? Guess who else is white. That’s right, a racist bigot xenophobe by the name of Donald Trump. Coincidence? Maybe. Probably not.
One of Hitler’s big platforms when running for president of a democratic country was anti-immigration. He said that Jews were taking all the dangerous jobs (construction, military) from Germans. This was true. Hitler resented the tremendous work ethic of Jews, which can be seen to this day.
Trump is also pushing against immigration, but this time from innocent, high-IQ, noble Mexicans. Coming here to help others, not to rape people and deal drugs as racist statistics would indicate, is what Donald is vehemently against.
There’s no denying that Hitler was a fascist. What does that word mean? We’re not sure, but it’s really bad.
Trump is mean to people, so it’s fair to say that he’s a fascist. Don’t believe it? Have you ever seen Schindler’s List? Do you want Mexicans to be put in cattle cars? Wow, just wow.
Trump makes us feel really bad inside. The Club for Growth and other organizations that seem to be uniformly pro-immigration and exclusively funded by certain people groups don’t seem to like him.
Much like Hitler, Trump seems to have a lot of white people who support him. This is bad. Why? Well, Hitler had a lot of white people who supported him. Enough said.
Did you know that Trump might have had a book of quotes by Hitler or with Hitler quotes or something? Why would he be reading that or even owning it if he wasn’t a Nazi? It just doesn’t add up! Everybody knows, Hitler was pure evil and never had any good ideas or thoughts applicable to politics. Don’t believe it? Educate yourself.
As if all that stuff wasn’t damning enough, did you know that Trump’s father was once in an altercation with the police at a KKK related event? If the KKK isn’t relevant in 2015, what is? Ever heard of Dylan Roof or Eric Dorner? They were probably somehow involved in the KKK or something. If he were alive today, Hitler would probably be in the KKK.
Racist fact after racist fact, racist outburst after racist outburst, Trump is consistently mean to the press and treats them like parasites for some unexplainable reason. Somehow, you dumb white hicks in flyover states that don’t really matter still support him. This is unacceptable.
If we are to continue the winning conservative track record, we need a moderate. Somebody like Rubio. He’s Latino, not white. That’s pretty cool. Carson would also be a good choice. He’s black. That’s also pretty cool. We’ve had enough of racist old white hicks telling the GOP what to do.
It’s 2015, don’t make the mistake of supporting the racist white fascist Nazi bigot KKK meanie.
A Critical Analysis of the Jewish Identity
18-12-2015
A Critical Analysis of the Jewish Identity, by Paul Townsteinburgh
What is the Jewish Identity ? To many Jews, it’s a general sense of belonging. While this sounds nice, it is exclusionary, and thus must be critiqued. One cannot be part of a special club and reject the title of bigot. In this current year, being a bigot is simply unacceptable.
How does the Jewish Identity (the JI for future reference) manifest itself? One strong aspect is within the media. As many respected and well established but unspecified people within well respected but unspecified fields people have remarked, the JI results in non-Jews being discriminated against in the field of media. This exclusionary feeling is likely due to Jewish people being raised in an ignorant and bigoted environment. Child abuse may or may not (probably may) be involved.
Just how damaging is the JI to the diversity so integral to the current culture? Frankly, the JI is a threat to all modern cultures. How can we expect to move forward while an entrenched monoculture (which results from the JI) remains in the past? Progress has been held back by the JI. Why do members of the JI behave in such a regressive manner ? This is mostly caused by sexual repression within their ranks. Such sexual repression results in a stodgy culture of monogamy. We must fix this by pushing free love on the Jewish community, in order to dismantle this repressive patriarchal system of almost puritanical morality.
At the core of the JI is a malevolent supremacy. This is the manifest in their rejection of outgroups who wish to innovate traditional Jewish cultural activities. Why reject diversity and progress within your community if not a false feeling of “betterness”? The root of this problem is, of course, a sexual feeling of inferiority. We must emphasize these psychosexual urges within their group dynamics. As a remedy to this, the JI shall be infiltrated with foreign members to procreate with their men and women. That way, the deep psychological psychosis will be treated at the root. This works for reasons.
In summary, the analytical community has come to a consensus. The science is settled . The Jewish Identity is harmful to both those who practice Judaism and those who don’t. As such, it is of the utmost importance to dismantle the harmful ideas that the JI propagates.
The government must subsidize mandatory psychoanalysis sessions for young children. Within those meetings, the youths must be shown that their work within culture is inferior and oppressive to countless outgroups. After that, they must be remedied of their oppressive faith. No longer can the young ones be led astray. Education for Jewish children must push the idea that traditional ideas of “one mate and many children” are outmoded and oppressive. Lastly, it’s imperative that we push opposite sex members of traditionally marginalized ethnic groups (Africans and Latinos) as desirable mates. Only then, can the harmful hegemonic nature of the JI be stomped out, lovingly, from history forever.
The Case For Catering To Women In Right Wing Movements
04-01-2016
Here are some right wing political movements that were helped by letting women steer the ship:
PS: This isn’t to say that women are inferior. They are different, and not fit to lead political movements. They are natural followers, and if you have good ideas, they will eventually follow. Focus on content and ideas, not the meta politics of ensuring women don’t get their feefees hurt.
The Modern Guide To Feminism
06-01-2016
It’s 2016, and from fat Jewish lesbians headlining comedy shows, to pozzed freaks getting more airtime in all walks of life, the world seems upside down. A fellow can easily find xirself way behind the curve.
With that in mind, it’s our moral duty to keep our readers up to speed on feminism. Here are some good guidelines to follow when attempting to look at current events through the lens of modern women’s rights:
Did some women just get raped? Are the perpetrators non-white? If so, it doesn’t really matter. Did Muslims just rape forty German women in Cologne? It doesn’t matter. The white devils got their privilege checked.
Maybe some of the raped women will give birth to beautiful half-inbred children with an IQ of around 90 or so. In light of this, is it really fair to use harsh language like “rape” if the little girls are spoiled white brats? It’s a growing up experience provided by diversity!
Does it have to do with non-European values? Some people get upset about the mutilation of child genitalia by Muslims. These people do not understand culture. Don’t judge, bigot. It doesn’t matter.
Are the perpetrators of a crime Muslim (non-white)? Sure, Muslims have child rape built into their very holy book. Sure, their prophet was a rapist. Sure, people from the Middle East have time and time again proved to be disgusting pieces of trash, but it doesn’t matter. I heard that somewhere, a white man is looking at a woman in the wrong way.
Heck, some young white children even post mean comments online about women. There’s no time to be wary or outraged over the culture and behavior of the millions of men we are importing near our sisters, wives, and daughters. No, they are not white, and as such, feminism is not interested in them.
It’s not about women’s rights. It’s about critiquing white people and values that are uniquely European.
If you’re still not sure about how this feminism thing works, take a look at these great feminist allies over at reddit.
They saw that women were raped. Lesser individuals would think the feminist thing to do was raise awareness about this problem. These mods are not lesser individuals. They are true warriors for social justice.
A sample of the high test individuals working at reddit. The antiwhite feminists (redundant) over at reddit locked a thread about the event, due to the “hateful” comments about rapists.
Andrew Breitbart thinks you’re all gay
15-03-2016
He’s dead. Stop bringing him up whenever you want to shame some pundit.
Andrew doesn’t care. He’s in hell for being homosexual.
Reminder that you can avoid that fate by repenting and accepting Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior.
How to hijack the moderate right.
15-03-2016
How to hijack the moderate right.
Mock pundits. Take them off the pedestal. Social media is great for this. All it takes is a few dozen notifications before they lash out. Once they start replying, the game is won. They’ve given a platform and legitimized audience criticism.
Twitter is currently the best format for engaging public figures. It’s possible to bait dozens of conservatives within minutes.
Come at them from the right. Don’t soften your rhetoric or play devil’s advocate with them. They’ll either concede points to you or go further left; push them towards the former.
Treat them like they’re obviously wrong. Don’t put a ton of effort into trying to explain to them. They can’t deal with this approach, as evidenced by their repeated acquiesces to the inferior left. They have a mindset of defeat, leverage it.
Couching your ideas in humor is also important. People listen well if you can make them laugh.
Once you have everybody arguing, it doesn’t matter if the “big figures” come over to your side or not. A portion of their audience will be exposed to your ideas and agree. They will voice their opinions as well, starting an exponential amount of discontent.
In summation, deride opinion makers, push your ideas, and cause a ruckus.
Mock pundits. Take them off the pedestal. Social media is great for this. All it takes is a few dozen notifications before they lash out. Once they start replying, the game is won. They’ve given a platform and legitimized audience criticism.
Twitter is currently the best format for engaging public figures. It’s possible to bait dozens of conservatives within minutes.
Come at them from the right. Don’t soften your rhetoric or play devil’s advocate with them. They’ll either concede points to you or go further left; push them towards the former.
Treat them like they’re obviously wrong. Don’t put a ton of effort into trying to explain to them. They can’t deal with this approach, as evidenced by their repeated acquiesces to the inferior left. They have a mindset of defeat, leverage it.
Couching your ideas in humor is also important. People listen well if you can make them laugh.
Once you have everybody arguing, it doesn’t matter if the “big figures” come over to your side or not. A portion of their audience will be exposed to your ideas and agree. They will voice their opinions as well, starting an exponential amount of discontent.
In summation, deride opinion makers, push your ideas, and cause a ruckus.
The definitive guide to Conservative Publications, Part 1:
16-03-2016
The right wing can be confusing to newly converted minorities. We are here to help!
Here are some summaries to help you start your path to True Republicanism:
National Review: Spiteful white gays, plotting dual-citizens, and a reoccurring deficit run the place. Articles go up regularly, to the delight of over two hundred passionate conservatives in nursing homes all across the country. Verbose and lacking pictures, nobody ever reads more than half an article. The comments are the only redeeming element to the site, but mods/autistics are doing their best to fix this.
Redstate: Nobody has ever read the site, although knowledgeable people have claimed it to be “quite basic.” Fat men and baseball nerds write most of the content.
The Blaze: Run by a scientologist alcoholic, it is an expert on the evangelical perspective. Want to know where God/The Constitution stands on any issue? Look no further. A few notable staff members are Brunette Power Dyke and Nu-male Youth Pastor. Great for when you miss church or synagogue.
DailyWire: A great site where former buzzfeed contributors can speak their mind without fear of bullying. Bibi Netenyahu gives it 30 pieces of silver out of 30 pieces of silver.
More to come soon…
The right wing can be confusing to newly converted minorities. We are here to help!
Here are some summaries to help you start your path to True Republicanism:
National Review: Spiteful white gays, plotting dual-citizens, and a reoccurring deficit run the place. Articles go up regularly, to the delight of over two hundred passionate conservatives in nursing homes all across the country. Verbose and lacking pictures, nobody ever reads more than half an article. The comments are the only redeeming element to the site, but mods/autistics are doing their best to fix this.
Redstate: Nobody has ever read the site, although knowledgeable people have claimed it to be “quite basic.” Fat men and baseball nerds write most of the content.
The Blaze: Run by a scientologist alcoholic, it is an expert on the evangelical perspective. Want to know where God/The Constitution stands on any issue? Look no further. A few notable staff members are Brunette Power Dyke and Nu-male Youth Pastor. Great for when you miss church or synagogue.
DailyWire: A great site where former buzzfeed contributors can speak their mind without fear of bullying. Bibi Netenyahu gives it 30 pieces of silver out of 30 pieces of silver.
More to come soon…
Mock pundits. Take them off the pedestal. Social media is great for this. All it takes is a few dozen notifications before they lash out. Once they start replying, the game is won. They’ve given a platform and legitimized audience criticism.
Twitter is currently the best format for engaging public figures. It’s possible to bait dozens of conservatives within minutes.
Come at them from the right. Don’t soften your rhetoric or play devil’s advocate with them. They’ll either concede points to you or go further left; push them towards the former.
Treat them like they’re obviously wrong. Don’t put a ton of effort into trying to explain to them. They can’t deal with this approach, as evidenced by their repeated acquiesces to the inferior left. They have a mindset of defeat, leverage it.
Couching your ideas in humor is also important. People listen well if you can make them laugh.
Once you have everybody arguing, it doesn’t matter if the “big figures” come over to your side or not. A portion of their audience will be exposed to your ideas and agree. They will voice their opinions as well, starting an exponential amount of discontent.
In summation, deride opinion makers, push your ideas, and cause a ruckus.
Mock pundits. Take them off the pedestal. Social media is great for this. All it takes is a few dozen notifications before they lash out. Once they start replying, the game is won. They’ve given a platform and legitimized audience criticism.
Twitter is currently the best format for engaging public figures. It’s possible to bait dozens of conservatives within minutes.
Come at them from the right. Don’t soften your rhetoric or play devil’s advocate with them. They’ll either concede points to you or go further left; push them towards the former.
Treat them like they’re obviously wrong. Don’t put a ton of effort into trying to explain to them. They can’t deal with this approach, as evidenced by their repeated acquiesces to the inferior left. They have a mindset of defeat, leverage it.
Couching your ideas in humor is also important. People listen well if you can make them laugh.
Once you have everybody arguing, it doesn’t matter if the “big figures” come over to your side or not. A portion of their audience will be exposed to your ideas and agree. They will voice their opinions as well, starting an exponential amount of discontent.
In summation, deride opinion makers, push your ideas, and cause a ruckus.
The Life of a Tumblrite Pt. 1
31-05-2015
I’m feeling a bit down today. I’ve got a case of depression. Life is hard for me. Writing articles online is really tiring. I have a load of laundry I need to pick up. My landlord is a total prick. My cable bill is going up.
People don’t realize how hard it is for a person like me. People don’t get how many hours I toiled away, getting my college degree in Creative Writing. Sure, engineers may build bridges. I build culture. Society undervalues thinkers like me.
People mock creative degrees. They don’t realize the tempest of emotions raging inside me. I was bullied in school. My pain needs to be shared with the whole world. Did you know I’m the survivor of over twenty attempted sexual molestations. I’m a warrior.
I’m a tough person. I do battle with trolls daily. My experiences and existential angst have given me a unique point of view that needs to be shared with the world. It would be selfish not to publish a few thousand words every week about my struggles with haters.
I’m not a proud person. I’m an introvert. I don’t love attention. I’m doing this out of self-sacrifice. People like me commit suicide all the time. Did I mention I’m the survivor of four suicide attempts? It’s a hard road I’m on, but I know my struggles will inspire others.
I write for others. I write for society. I bare it all. I’m so tired. I don’t even edit my posts. I want to put my realest, most vulnerable, self forward. I’m a digital martyr. I don’t do this for attention.
Sure, my former classmates all call me a big drama queen. They’re just jealous. They’re just projecting their self-loathing. They’ve lived lives chock full of privilege. They have solid jobs that they were all handed.
In all honesty I’m angry. Furious that endangered people like me are marginalized. They call us mentally ill attention seekers. We don’t deserve this. I don’t deserve this. I’m unique and beautiful. I don’t feel it though.
I’m feeling a bit down today. I’ve got a case of depression. Life is hard for me. Writing articles online is really tiring. I have a load of laundry I need to pick up. My landlord is a total prick. My cable bill is going up.People don’t realize how hard it is for a person like me. People don’t get how many hours I toiled away, getting my college degree in Creative Writing. Sure, engineers may build bridges. I build culture. Society undervalues thinkers like me.
People mock creative degrees. They don’t realize the tempest of emotions raging inside me. I was bullied in school. My pain needs to be shared with the whole world. Did you know I’m the survivor of over twenty attempted sexual molestations. I’m a warrior.
I’m a tough person. I do battle with trolls daily. My experiences and existential angst have given me a unique point of view that needs to be shared with the world. It would be selfish not to publish a few thousand words every week about my struggles with haters.
I’m not a proud person. I’m an introvert. I don’t love attention. I’m doing this out of self-sacrifice. People like me commit suicide all the time. Did I mention I’m the survivor of four suicide attempts? It’s a hard road I’m on, but I know my struggles will inspire others.
I write for others. I write for society. I bare it all. I’m so tired. I don’t even edit my posts. I want to put my realest, most vulnerable, self forward. I’m a digital martyr. I don’t do this for attention.
Sure, my former classmates all call me a big drama queen. They’re just jealous. They’re just projecting their self-loathing. They’ve lived lives chock full of privilege. They have solid jobs that they were all handed.
In all honesty I’m angry. Furious that endangered people like me are marginalized. They call us mentally ill attention seekers. We don’t deserve this. I don’t deserve this. I’m unique and beautiful. I don’t feel it though.
Free Speech Isn’t Just a Lack of Government Censorship
09-06-2015
If you’ve been following any tech or free speech related news recently, you’ve probably heard about Curtis Yarvin. Here’s a brief summary: Curtis is now uninvited from speaking at a tech conference due to his (unrelated to the talk) political beliefs. In light of this and similar recent events (the ludicrous banning of Chuck Johnson from twitter), let’s take a look at free speech as an idea and tool.
The concept of free speech has been misunderstood by the general public. Whether or not the confusion is intentional is a matter for an entirely different post. Free speech, when written about on popular sites, is generally discussed as follows:
“The government is not preventing anyone from saying what they want. A company refusing to give a platform to bigots is not censorship. The right to free speech is does not apply to private companies. Companies shouldn’t be forced to host opinions they find offensive. It’s not illegal.”
While this is technically correct, it misrepresents the arguments that free speech advocates are making. No sane person is saying companies should be forced to host these opinions. That argument has somehow become a meme on the internet that gets used to end the conversation before it starts. No, free speech advocates are arguing that companies should feel morally obligated to allow controversial opinions.
Free speech is more than the something that stops the government from sending storm troopers to knock down your door in the middle of the night for saying the wrong combination of words. Free speech is an idea. Free speech is a public concept that keeps a society full of diverse opinions. Without the public embracing free speech, women in America wouldn’t have the right to vote, drug laws wouldn’t be getting more lenient, and homosexual marriage rights wouldn’t be anywhere near where they are today.
Free speech allows protestors to take to twitter and facebook and declare their discontent with problems they see. The public’s encouragement of free speech allows people to do this without fear of personal retribution. It gives everyone room to violate social norms and push for a world they think is better. How does that harm anybody?
Free speech as a concept is under assault. People are gleeful when opponents are banned from social platforms for obviously trumped up charges. What good does that do? What good is a site for talking if you have to guess whether or not you’ll lose your “privileges” if you say the wrong combination of words?
Free speech is integral to a healthy society. Anything else ends up with a tyranny of the majority. Damaging ideas are spread and accepted without question. Critical thinking is actively discouraged and “wrongthink” in the form of anything vaguely counter the currently fashionable social opinion is a punishable offense.
There are abhorrent people on the internet with horrible ideas. Let them say their piece. Then, in the public eye with thousands of impressionable people watching, dismantle their arguments with facts. In open and honest debate, good ideas are not silenced by foolish ones. Lies are afraid of examination, the truth is not.
Provide a platform for what is considered by some to be hate, bigotry, and racism. What is there to lose? Draw the evil into the light, and deal with it in the public square, rather than pushing it to fester in the dark. Everybody deserves to have their position considered, and to punish those the mob disagrees with is antithetical to a nuanced and free society.
If you’ve been following any tech or free speech related news recently, you’ve probably heard about Curtis Yarvin. Here’s a brief summary: Curtis is now uninvited from speaking at a tech conference due to his (unrelated to the talk) political beliefs. In light of this and similar recent events (the ludicrous banning of Chuck Johnson from twitter), let’s take a look at free speech as an idea and tool.The concept of free speech has been misunderstood by the general public. Whether or not the confusion is intentional is a matter for an entirely different post. Free speech, when written about on popular sites, is generally discussed as follows:
“The government is not preventing anyone from saying what they want. A company refusing to give a platform to bigots is not censorship. The right to free speech is does not apply to private companies. Companies shouldn’t be forced to host opinions they find offensive. It’s not illegal.”
While this is technically correct, it misrepresents the arguments that free speech advocates are making. No sane person is saying companies should be forced to host these opinions. That argument has somehow become a meme on the internet that gets used to end the conversation before it starts. No, free speech advocates are arguing that companies should feel morally obligated to allow controversial opinions.
Free speech is more than the something that stops the government from sending storm troopers to knock down your door in the middle of the night for saying the wrong combination of words. Free speech is an idea. Free speech is a public concept that keeps a society full of diverse opinions. Without the public embracing free speech, women in America wouldn’t have the right to vote, drug laws wouldn’t be getting more lenient, and homosexual marriage rights wouldn’t be anywhere near where they are today.
Free speech allows protestors to take to twitter and facebook and declare their discontent with problems they see. The public’s encouragement of free speech allows people to do this without fear of personal retribution. It gives everyone room to violate social norms and push for a world they think is better. How does that harm anybody?
Free speech as a concept is under assault. People are gleeful when opponents are banned from social platforms for obviously trumped up charges. What good does that do? What good is a site for talking if you have to guess whether or not you’ll lose your “privileges” if you say the wrong combination of words?
Free speech is integral to a healthy society. Anything else ends up with a tyranny of the majority. Damaging ideas are spread and accepted without question. Critical thinking is actively discouraged and “wrongthink” in the form of anything vaguely counter the currently fashionable social opinion is a punishable offense.
There are abhorrent people on the internet with horrible ideas. Let them say their piece. Then, in the public eye with thousands of impressionable people watching, dismantle their arguments with facts. In open and honest debate, good ideas are not silenced by foolish ones. Lies are afraid of examination, the truth is not.
Provide a platform for what is considered by some to be hate, bigotry, and racism. What is there to lose? Draw the evil into the light, and deal with it in the public square, rather than pushing it to fester in the dark. Everybody deserves to have their position considered, and to punish those the mob disagrees with is antithetical to a nuanced and free society.
Oven Culture
12-09-2015
A few weeks ago, the MTV Teen Choices Awards were on television. I knew it would be bad, but was still left awestruck at the utter scale of degeneracy. Glorification of sodomy, “role models” acting like white trash, and fifteen prancing transsexual freaks for a finale were just a few of the vibrant cultural experiences shown to ten million impressionable teens.
One point that really stuck to me was the mentioning of the “sticky young minds” watching the show. The blatant corruption of western culture was on full display.
With every passing day, I see more clearly the mistake of democracy. There are no longer moral authorities allowed to declare evil as evil, and good as good. There are no repercussions for those acting like disgusting animals in heat. The corruption of the youth, and with it the future of our country, is an inevitable consequence. Without the guiding hand of a morally superior leader, it is the dregs of society that lead. Perversion and moral ills are held up as enviable.
No, not everybody is created equally. A man with mental illness that causes him to mutilate his body is not equal to a father who teaches his children to live with purpose and integrity. A man who inserts his genitalia into the place where a man defecates and feels the need to base his identity off such behavior is not fit to instruct children in any matter. He is not equal to a woman devoted to helping children learn. He is inferior.
By virtue of his actions, a man who creates is worth more to society than one who destroys. Everybody is born with different flaws and abilities. That everybody is equal is an idea that upon examination collapses upon itself at breathtaking speed. Is a pedophile worth the same as a leader? One is worse than nothing, and the other inspires men to do great deeds. They are not equal, and it is foolish to even suggest such a notion.
The West has gotten into its head that all cultures are of equal value. With that mindset, any replacement of the traditional is not to be looked at with distrust and worry, but rather excitement at a new, different, and fun way of doing things.
European culture has been built by thinkers, warriors, and men of great spiritual and philosophical yearnings. Other cultures are based upon inherently inferior material, and their fruits bear witness to this fact. It is not until we wake up from this stupor that we can begin to retake what ground we’ve lost. True restoration will not come until the threat of destruction is felt in every aspect of life.
A few weeks ago, the MTV Teen Choices Awards were on television. I knew it would be bad, but was still left awestruck at the utter scale of degeneracy. Glorification of sodomy, “role models” acting like white trash, and fifteen prancing transsexual freaks for a finale were just a few of the vibrant cultural experiences shown to ten million impressionable teens.One point that really stuck to me was the mentioning of the “sticky young minds” watching the show. The blatant corruption of western culture was on full display.
With every passing day, I see more clearly the mistake of democracy. There are no longer moral authorities allowed to declare evil as evil, and good as good. There are no repercussions for those acting like disgusting animals in heat. The corruption of the youth, and with it the future of our country, is an inevitable consequence. Without the guiding hand of a morally superior leader, it is the dregs of society that lead. Perversion and moral ills are held up as enviable.
No, not everybody is created equally. A man with mental illness that causes him to mutilate his body is not equal to a father who teaches his children to live with purpose and integrity. A man who inserts his genitalia into the place where a man defecates and feels the need to base his identity off such behavior is not fit to instruct children in any matter. He is not equal to a woman devoted to helping children learn. He is inferior.
By virtue of his actions, a man who creates is worth more to society than one who destroys. Everybody is born with different flaws and abilities. That everybody is equal is an idea that upon examination collapses upon itself at breathtaking speed. Is a pedophile worth the same as a leader? One is worse than nothing, and the other inspires men to do great deeds. They are not equal, and it is foolish to even suggest such a notion.
The West has gotten into its head that all cultures are of equal value. With that mindset, any replacement of the traditional is not to be looked at with distrust and worry, but rather excitement at a new, different, and fun way of doing things.
European culture has been built by thinkers, warriors, and men of great spiritual and philosophical yearnings. Other cultures are based upon inherently inferior material, and their fruits bear witness to this fact. It is not until we wake up from this stupor that we can begin to retake what ground we’ve lost. True restoration will not come until the threat of destruction is felt in every aspect of life.
Cuck Me Baby, One More Time
12-09-2015
It was fascinating to watch the reaction when the Cuckservative meme first picked up speed on twitter. Over the course of a week or two, every single balding and African-adopting conservative father blogger was up in arms and ‘not I!’ing. When the angry posts, blocking people, and deleting comments had subsided, the view was entertaining to say the least. This horrible Nazi racist bigot slur had managed to throw the whole moderate right wing into a tizzy.
In case you have a social life and aren’t all that active on esoteric rightwing sites, the word Cuckservative is simply a mix of “conservative” and “cuckold”. It describes those of the Republican persuasion who put the interests of others over their own constituents. This all stems from their lack of core convictions, and results in to weak, embarrassing, and ultimately futile attempts to gain respect from left wingers.
According to the various dullards that are just so happen to represent the GOP on TV (funny how that works, huh) and blogs, cuckservative was somehow a reference to a black man having sex with a married white woman as the emasculated husband watches. Their description is actually that of a very specific type of porn. Besides being incorrect, this begs the question as to why supposedly Christian men have such intimate knowledge of a degenerate subject. Never mind that this newly coined slang doesn’t even make sense within the context of porn, the brilliant cuckservatives ran with it.
Instead of defending their stances on issues, the decision was made to shame those involved in pushing the term. Unfortunately for these Big Tent media moguls, they were too retarded to realize the idiocy of their plan. Chan users and anonymous twitter accounts are generally people not too worried about reputation.
The biggest problem with the slimy tactics of Erickson and Co. was the hyperbolic content of their accusations. They shrieked to anybody who could hear, in an attempt signal their virtue to all onlookers. As a result, their histrionics caused the unforeseen and totally unpredictable side effect of informing the thousands of their readers that don’t happen to visit Nazi forums or far right blogs. Some real genius on strategy.
“Pay no attention to the people trying to talk with us! That commenter who listed six million reasons why my immigration stance is poorly thought out is just a nasty Nazi who is also a Clinton plant paid off by Soros! It’s only one guy with six million sock puppets! It’s just stormfront! Don’t even attempt to think about this word in relation to us!” Misdirection might have worked, if any of the alternative storylines had a modicum of sense or proportionality to them. As intellectually asleep as most of their readers seem to be, even they know that not every right-wing critique is the work of a democrat sleeper-cell.
Just because I don’t want the entirety of America to look like Mexico and Detroit doesn’t make me a Nazi. Just because I would rather buy maple syrup than tacos in Vermont doesn’t make a genocidal maniac. I care about the future of my country. Trying to demonize me and my legitimately concerned friends just highlights the insincerity of their stances.
With each denial, the meme is proven increasingly correct. That’s what makes it so potent. The republicuck pinheads would rather scorn their actual base (white males) and pander to people who will never respect them. Trump has shown that people want self-confidence and convictions based on facts. Kowtowing to the lowest common denominator, people whose own countries don’t even want, is the mark of a thoroughly cucked individual.
Make no are mistake, the republicans incapable of winning without the white vote. Every other ethnicity is naturally liberal. They come from welfare countries, with welfare mindsets, and view governments as free money dispensers. Strong Christian values and natural conservatives? That’s why they traffic in children and hard drugs. The democrats have locked up the gibs-me-dat constituent, and show no sign of loosening their grip.
The GOP can try and try, but they won’t get the vote of people who hate them. Every year, millions of non-whites pour in and lessen the percentage of the vote the GOP can get. The GOP should be winning over the white vote and slowing down immigration ASAP. Inexplicably they attack their ever shrinking base.
They mock us, ignore us, block us, and libel us. Anything to try and remain “respectable” in the eyes of the MSM.
Here’s a little tip, Wilson: Nobody respects you. You’re never going to convert the drug running latinos or ghetto blacks. The people you could connect with have been driven away by you. You are your own worst enemy. You smack of defeat. You and your fellow emasculated buddies all exude weakness. You’ve spit on your only base. Pack your bags, you’re fired.
– The new mainstream right-wing
The Global Conspiracy Against Women
29-10-2015
Note from Paul Town: I received this anonymous email from a reader in response to the beautiful letter by Jennifer Lawrence regarding the scourge of the Gender Pay Gap that financially attacks women every day in the regressive United States. I have already tried to trace the IP but the letter writer was behind multiple proxies. Otherwise I would have reported him to the police and publicly named and shamed him. Here is the triggering message:
I’m a rather large business owner. I employ many women and men. Approximately a 50/50 split. I save thousands of dollars daily by paying women much much less.
How do I do this you may ask? Firstly, I’ve found that men are extremely willing to screw women over. I’ve called each of my male employees into my office and offered them a bonus if they lied to their female coworkers about their wages. Without fail, each fellow leaped at the chance. I think they would have done it without a bonus. That’s how awesome our genitalia based club is.
Another tactic we cigar smoking CEOs employ is a little thing called Gender Based Wage Fixing, or GBWF for short. We have industry wide chat rooms where we talk about paying women less. We have conferences about paying women less. It’s just really fun to keep women down.
Why do we do this? Inside of each man is a sincere hatred for women. We know if they ever rise up we will be useless. If we ever allow the fairer sex to begin working in construction, teaching hard sciences, and building rocketships, soon the male will be rendered useless.
A major cause of this economy-wide (and totally existent) wage gap is our jealousy. Ever seen the #MasculinitySoFragile hashtag on twitter? It’s real. See, men are jealous of women. We envy their deep understanding of social issues. We crave their emotional and logical superiority. We see them do the hardest thing in the world (childbirth) and realize we could never be that strong. We seethe with hatred for our natural betters.
Some men will say, “I’m not part of this conspiracy. This is ridiculous and crazy.” They are lying. If we didn’t have everybody in our club, this whole scheme wouldn’t work. Everybody knows women and men are equally as good (in reality women are smarter and stronger than men) at every job. A non-misogynist male could employ all women at a cheaper rate than the male competitors and make better margins. If that ever happened, our whole scheme would collapse. Luckily, all males are complicit in this sexism.
It’s not that women are naturally more fulfilled in vital roles such as raising children. It’s not that women are more suited to home life. It’s not that women desire having a family more than slaving away at an office. No, it’s a vast global conspiracy.
Note from Paul Town: I received this anonymous email from a reader in response to the beautiful letter by Jennifer Lawrence regarding the scourge of the Gender Pay Gap that financially attacks women every day in the regressive United States. I have already tried to trace the IP but the letter writer was behind multiple proxies. Otherwise I would have reported him to the police and publicly named and shamed him. Here is the triggering message:
I’m a rather large business owner. I employ many women and men. Approximately a 50/50 split. I save thousands of dollars daily by paying women much much less.
How do I do this you may ask? Firstly, I’ve found that men are extremely willing to screw women over. I’ve called each of my male employees into my office and offered them a bonus if they lied to their female coworkers about their wages. Without fail, each fellow leaped at the chance. I think they would have done it without a bonus. That’s how awesome our genitalia based club is.
Another tactic we cigar smoking CEOs employ is a little thing called Gender Based Wage Fixing, or GBWF for short. We have industry wide chat rooms where we talk about paying women less. We have conferences about paying women less. It’s just really fun to keep women down.
Why do we do this? Inside of each man is a sincere hatred for women. We know if they ever rise up we will be useless. If we ever allow the fairer sex to begin working in construction, teaching hard sciences, and building rocketships, soon the male will be rendered useless.
A major cause of this economy-wide (and totally existent) wage gap is our jealousy. Ever seen the #MasculinitySoFragile hashtag on twitter? It’s real. See, men are jealous of women. We envy their deep understanding of social issues. We crave their emotional and logical superiority. We see them do the hardest thing in the world (childbirth) and realize we could never be that strong. We seethe with hatred for our natural betters.
Some men will say, “I’m not part of this conspiracy. This is ridiculous and crazy.” They are lying. If we didn’t have everybody in our club, this whole scheme wouldn’t work. Everybody knows women and men are equally as good (in reality women are smarter and stronger than men) at every job. A non-misogynist male could employ all women at a cheaper rate than the male competitors and make better margins. If that ever happened, our whole scheme would collapse. Luckily, all males are complicit in this sexism.
It’s not that women are naturally more fulfilled in vital roles such as raising children. It’s not that women are more suited to home life. It’s not that women desire having a family more than slaving away at an office. No, it’s a vast global conspiracy.
Is your country one of the many European countries taking pity on all the poor military aged males fleeing war-torn countries? First off, good on you! It’s Europe’s job (remember the Holocaust) to take in refugees so bad things don’t happen (don’t forget the Holocaust) to them (another Holocaust). You are doing your duty!
Since these men are coming from oppressive cultures, it’s important not to give them culture shock. You must ease them into abstaining from female genital mutilation and child brides. They can still have male circumcision though because that’s purely a religious procedure. Change is good, but not too much change! Baby steps are important.
Here are some accommodations your country should make so that hundreds of thousands of men don’t feel too uncomfortable. Don’t worry though, you will be able to learn about tons of cool traditions.
Firstly, have your blonde women dye their hair. See, most men from the Middle East are dealing with non-European women. As such, they cannot be reasonably expected to contain their excitement and refrain from raping any good looking white women they see.
You should also have your women travel in packs. Much like the blonde hair and white facial features are just too much to handle for your new friends and neighbors, a woman walking alone is practically begging to be kidnapped, raped, and abused. That’s just common sense. Women love to travel in groups anyway, so this is barely any accommodation.
One last thing for the women. This one is sure to be a big hit. Don’t you hate having to pick out an outfit each day? All that gross individualism is so very tiring! Now, you can just throw on a black robe that covers everything but your eyes. It’s like a masquerade party every day for the rest of your life! Don’t worry about forgetting to wear it, as the nice brown men will remind you by spitting and calling you a whore. It’s a win-win!
You like bacon or ham? Did you know it’s as bad for you as smoking is? Coincidentally, just has hordes of people with religious objections to pork have made landfall in small (formerly) European towns, the World Health Organization released a statement advising people not to eat too much meat! How great, the refugees are actually helping everybody live healthier!
Europeans might be accustomed to clean streets and trains not filled with feces and trash. Where is the variety? This is so boring. Now, young children will have lots of cultural stimulation as they walk their newly enriched neighborhood and try to keep from catching sickness from the unsanitary conditions. So many new sights and smells!
Speaking of children and cultural stimulation, did you know that Europeans have silly ideas about children? They seem to think children are not to be coerced to have sex with middle aged men. Some ridiculous concept of children being innocent and not sex slaves. The people soon to be living near your school will fix that notion. It’s time we let old Muslim men free young European boys and girls from the oppression of virginity.
All that and more awaits your formerly quiet town. Some future attractions will include, but are not limited to, public stonings, hangings, and riots asking for free stuff! Remember, Europeans are nothing special. They shouldn’t be exclusionary (remember the Holocaust). All cultures are equal. All people, regardless of the entirety of history, are equal (don’t forget the Holocaust). It is very important Europe accepts that it won’t be a white land for white people anymore. Whiteness and White exceptionalism is such a myth anyway!
Conservatives: Good Riddance, Don’t Rest in Peace
30-03-2016
“Why are so many people so angry? Why do I get so many horrible messages on social media? Why are the comments under my article filled with disgusting ideas? All these things are happening, and it’s not my fault at all!”
Maybe it’s time for the so-called conservative establishment to do a little self-reflection.
You took a country that was thriving, and opened the borders at the behest of foreign donors and multinational corporations.
You slur anybody to the right of you. The people you call colleagues and friends are always one article away from being purged from your gay little club. You do nothing to advance any real ideas. You function as gracious losers for the left.
“We’ll get them next time!”
You never do.
You have no self-respect. You confuse that with hate for your audience.
You failed to defend your base, white males. Now, you openly wish for our demise. Your condescension is palpable. It won’t be forgotten.
You squandered most – if not all – you were given. We’re now turning to a reality TV personality for help.
You’re not even good at your jobs. You’re incompetent. An extravagant billionaire with multiple affairs and a horrible hairpiece is mopping the floor with you.
You’re actively trying to undermine the security of a man who gets hundreds – if not thousands – of death threats every day. Lying, misquoting, the trickery never ends.
Now, you’re inflaming tensions in a breathtaking manner. You’re attacking the only person who appears to care for America. If only you fought to preserve the country half as hard as you are fighting the first nationalist to appear on the scene.
Now, you’re going to watch as we strip you of your influence and publicly humiliate you. You’ll scream, you’ll cry, you’ll struggle, and then you’ll give up. We’ll relish every second of it.
You’re the outgroup now.
Ted Cruz’s America in 2020
13-04-2016
The sky clears, barn swallows chirp nearby, and little mystery meat kids are cheering in the throbbing crowd. The time has come. The blue curtain with an emblazoned Star of David begins to lift. Music starts to swell.
The birds fly off, and President Ted Cruz stands behind his podium. A hush falls over the crowd. One minute. Two minutes. One hundred minutes of silence. One for each constitutional amendment. A baby with a maple leaf shirt is heard crying softly. Finally, one word falls from Cruz’s seductive lips: “Constitutional.”
The crowd erupts in raucous cheers, shaking the nearby Wailing Wall. In his first term, Ted had been so much of an outsider that he had managed to move the city of Jerusalem to downtown DC. All it took was increasing the yearly foreign aid to Israel by a constitutional percentage of 1776%.
It is a new era in The United States of Cubacanadamerica. This is a new century, with cheap Chinese foreign made Tim Hortons and bountiful amounts of Cuban cigars. Ted has brought about the Founders dream.
Reaching into a nearby satchel, Cruz grabs and throws blocks of the finest cheese into the crowd. It’s a scene of ecstasy, as a newly legalized forty-five year old man name Pedro Huevos Rancheros Salamanca beats the last pure Aryan American for some of the coveted Constitutional Gouda, blessed by the National Taste Tester himself, Erick Erickson.
This display of American superiority is interrupted as a helicopter roars just a few feet overhead. A solitary Holy Navy Seal slides down the rope, with the rather plump Minister of Christianity/End Times Prepping – Glenn Beck – strapped to his back. “Behold, the priesthood is rising!” shouts Beck in a quivering voice, as he continues to descend from the heavens like a plus sized angel. After landing, Beck makes a short speech on the virtues of not drinking coffee and instead spending all your money on gold. He then hurries off the stage to go to a revival meeting.
The crowd is really going wild now. Ted’s father makes a quick appearance. He mutters some words about his son ruling the world and then rates his fifteen latest trysts, in language too foul (and creepy in a foreign manner) to print. After that, he leaves the stage and his son closes the event with a recital of The Constitution. This is America in 2020.
Pretzeling Worldviews: Why Do Republican AntiRacists Hate the Free Market?
15-04-2016
A few months ago, Ben Shapiro went on record advocating for hunting down racists and harming their careers.
“It would be idiotic to think otherwise. Of course there are legitimate racists and we should target them and we should find them and we should ruin their careers because racism is unacceptable.”
– Ben Shapiro
Rightly so, actually right-wing voices like Vox Day (who has had Shapiro’s number since the early 2000’s) called Ben out on his authoritarian baloney.
Flash forward a few months, a hoax and a resignation from Breitbart later, Shapiro has responded to the right wing’s rejection of his antiracist framework. In the article, BREAKING: Apparently, I’m Now A Social Justice Warrior! , Shapiro makes the argument that what he said was fine because he meant we should harm the careers of those who enact racist ideas instead of those who just express racist ideas. This is absurd and runs counter to his supposed love of the free market.
Let’s pretend a widget business is run by a fellow who refuses to hire blacks. If that is an irrational policy, a similar company — without these horrible racist rules — can swoop in and outcompete the other company. It will have a bigger pool of talent to pull from, and as such, customers will move from Company Racist to the functionally better Company Perfect Equality.
However, if Company Racist (CR) continues to thrive and outcompete Company Perfect Equality (CPE), the wrongthink policies of CR must better reflect reality than CPE’s policies.
“In America’s capitalist market, there is no need for the pearl clutching antiracists to tinker around.”
Why then, should we enact Ben Shapiro’s vision of social justice on Company Racist? If their policies are wrong, they’ll lose out naturally. If their policies are working and they’re thriving, why should they be hunted down by the mob and harmed? It’s just good business. In America’s capitalist market, there is no need for the pearl clutching antiracists to tinker around.
Let’s put it in terms that Ben may better understand. For argument’s sake, let’s say a Jewish barber lives in a town where a bunch of evil white nationalists exist. These white nationalists are so horrid, they think that white people have the right to live in a country without any blacks, Asians, or Jews. Currently, these monstrous white nationalists live in peace – albeit through gritted teeth – with blacks, Asians, and even Jews.
The Jewish barber, understandably uncomfortable around white nationalists, should be allowed to ban whites from entering his shop. Yes, such a policy would be racist. That’s OK! If the barber doesn’t create enough value for the rest of the community, his business will fail. If the business doesn’t fail, that means the barber is still creating value.
If there is enough demand, an inclusive barber shop will pop up. The racist Jewish barber is happy, the new barber shop is happy, and the evil white nationalists are happy. There’s nothing wrong with discrimination.
Perhaps Shapiro and his authoritarian ilk are ignorant regarding basic economics. Maybe they wish to control discourse and set the boundaries of acceptable political discourse. It’s probably a mix of both. Either way, they don’t bother to make an actual case why their version of the PC police is any better than the current version of the PC police.
Is all of Conservatism Inc. this lacking in intellectual rigor? No wonder the last thirty years have consisted of nothing but failure for the self-proclaimed voices of the right.
A few months ago, Ben Shapiro went on record advocating for hunting down racists and harming their careers.
“It would be idiotic to think otherwise. Of course there are legitimate racists and we should target them and we should find them and we should ruin their careers because racism is unacceptable.”
– Ben Shapiro
Rightly so, actually right-wing voices like Vox Day (who has had Shapiro’s number since the early 2000’s) called Ben out on his authoritarian baloney.
Flash forward a few months, a hoax and a resignation from Breitbart later, Shapiro has responded to the right wing’s rejection of his antiracist framework. In the article, BREAKING: Apparently, I’m Now A Social Justice Warrior! , Shapiro makes the argument that what he said was fine because he meant we should harm the careers of those who enact racist ideas instead of those who just express racist ideas. This is absurd and runs counter to his supposed love of the free market.
Let’s pretend a widget business is run by a fellow who refuses to hire blacks. If that is an irrational policy, a similar company — without these horrible racist rules — can swoop in and outcompete the other company. It will have a bigger pool of talent to pull from, and as such, customers will move from Company Racist to the functionally better Company Perfect Equality.
However, if Company Racist (CR) continues to thrive and outcompete Company Perfect Equality (CPE), the wrongthink policies of CR must better reflect reality than CPE’s policies.
“In America’s capitalist market, there is no need for the pearl clutching antiracists to tinker around.”
Why then, should we enact Ben Shapiro’s vision of social justice on Company Racist? If their policies are wrong, they’ll lose out naturally. If their policies are working and they’re thriving, why should they be hunted down by the mob and harmed? It’s just good business. In America’s capitalist market, there is no need for the pearl clutching antiracists to tinker around.
Let’s put it in terms that Ben may better understand. For argument’s sake, let’s say a Jewish barber lives in a town where a bunch of evil white nationalists exist. These white nationalists are so horrid, they think that white people have the right to live in a country without any blacks, Asians, or Jews. Currently, these monstrous white nationalists live in peace – albeit through gritted teeth – with blacks, Asians, and even Jews.
The Jewish barber, understandably uncomfortable around white nationalists, should be allowed to ban whites from entering his shop. Yes, such a policy would be racist. That’s OK! If the barber doesn’t create enough value for the rest of the community, his business will fail. If the business doesn’t fail, that means the barber is still creating value.
If there is enough demand, an inclusive barber shop will pop up. The racist Jewish barber is happy, the new barber shop is happy, and the evil white nationalists are happy. There’s nothing wrong with discrimination.
Perhaps Shapiro and his authoritarian ilk are ignorant regarding basic economics. Maybe they wish to control discourse and set the boundaries of acceptable political discourse. It’s probably a mix of both. Either way, they don’t bother to make an actual case why their version of the PC police is any better than the current version of the PC police.
Is all of Conservatism Inc. this lacking in intellectual rigor? No wonder the last thirty years have consisted of nothing but failure for the self-proclaimed voices of the right.
A Special Endorsement from a Brother from Another Mother
16-04-2016
Why are American blacks so friggin gay? What once was a noble race of kangz and philosophers is now a race of homosexual ninnies who just can’t hang . What a bunch of fruits!
As a black man in America, I’m forced to be related to queers who watch anime, know about “intersexualism”, and actively push the Zionist homosexual agenda. What the freak, my chocolate brothers? Why are you guys out here, acting “a foo”?
I used to think that whites were gay. Then I saw what sus niggas like Lil’ Based G was doing. Have you all lost your dang tooting minds? What to heck?
Dressing in dresses, speaking in effeminate accents, acting a fool. Y’all niggas need to put an end to this.
I write to you, my woketep hoteps, to bring to you a message of unification. We must pull together with our melanin challenged brothers, the whites. We must come together, get woke together, and bring the honorary pimpnigga Donald J. Trump to power.
This is our last chance. Soon, the devil’s synagogue will cover this AfriCAN globe in darkness. Not a woke darkness, but rather a Banking Cabal of High Interest Rates type of darkness. No nigga got time for that sort of foolishness.
Only one man stands in the way of the eternal hummus parasite. What type of evil demon likes hummus? One that has no place on planet earth.
Only one man stands in the way of eternal shekel midget rule. That’s why I, Alfred Freeman Collard Greens Smithtown Jones, am endorsing the Donald J. Trump for president.
–AFCGSJ
American Nationalism as the Moral Choice
27-04-2016
All too often, nationalism – more specifically white nationalism – is portrayed as an aggressive and evil ideology. People fail to realize that nationalism is merely the practice of organizing priorities in a pragmatic and reasonable way.
Children begin life with a naïve sense of optimism. Many believe everything will be perfect, then they grow up and see the screwed up state of the world around them. While they adjust their personal outlook on life, many adults retain a childlike view about the world we live in.
There will never be a utopia. There will always be pain and suffering. Children will die of disease, women will get raped, and men will be murdered. It’s a sad reality, but being that we are not omnipotent gods and our resources are limited, we are not able to fix everything. With that in mind, it’s best to min-max the resources available, and target local communities. Any surplus local aid can be sent to foreigners. Yes, it’s not a perfect setup, but it’s still the best setup available.
Focusing on the immediate community, your country, helps protect vulnerable members of society from foreign criminals. All along the border, tales of inhumane acts such as beheadings and other forms of debased brutality surface daily. Proper nationalistic policy would ensure that our borders are secure and illegals are dealt with harshly before they can wreak havoc on locals. Less illegals means vastly less rapes, murders, drug trafficking, etc.
Nationalism protects the economy, helping to ensure a workforce that enables your son to provide for his wife and children. Yes, it’s cheaper for companies to export their jobs to China where thousands slave away for mere pennies. That is, it’s cheaper until fines for exporting jobs make it more cost effective to pay local workers in US based factories. Yes, the goods will cost more, but the money and jobs will stay in the national economy. A bustling economy is good for the soul, what sort of heartless individual wouldn’t want that?
Nationalism promotes community. As Robert Putnam’s study indicates, the more diverse a group of people, the less trust and cooperation occurs. The logical reaction to diversity’s effect is to push for policies that will ensure communities of ethnically and culturally similar people. In the case of the United States, a white country, an immigration policy that prefers ethnic Europeans is optimal. This discrimination will improve communities in other tangible ways too, as whites tend to commit crimes and go on welfare at rates much lower than black or Hispanic individuals. The more homogenous America can become (through common sense policy and deportation of illegals), the less crime will occur and the safer our women and children will be. What goodhearted person can argue against safety for the more vulnerable members (of all races) of society?
Nationalistic immigration policy promotes local health. Many in the media are consistently up in arms about parents who refuse to vaccinate their children. While this concern is certainly valid, they seem to overlook the fact that immigration from foreign people groups brings a whole host of health issues and unforeseen diseases . A nation that prefers highly productive and homogenous individuals for importation will be healthier and more efficient in the long run than a country with no regard for what it imports.
When you look at the resulting positives: community, health, jobs, and safety, a picture of nationalism as the moral choice quickly emerges. There’s no need for ethnic cleansing. There’s no need for a race war. There’s no need for gas chambers (although lots of “dual” citizens in the media need to be arrested or deported) or ditches full of bodies. Sure, all that will probably have to happen once non-European groups become the majority, but why not try this peaceful solution first? All we need to do is put America first and remove the anti-white policies, and we can return to making America great again. Who doesn’t want that?
Islam Is Not The Problem
30-05-2016
By Jared Taylor Swift
Spend some time in any right-wing Nationalist circle and you’ll hear people say “Islam is the problem.” It is considered by many to be the chief enemy of Western civilization. But, frankly, this is not true. It’s easy to shake your fist at some lady in a burka and blame her for all your woes, and it’s difficult to admit your faults. But blaming Islam fixes little. To say that these uncivilized packs of Arab refugees are destroying Europe is to say that the Germanic tribes destroyed Rome. Rome did not fall in a day. There were centuries of decadence and decline that effectively destroyed Rome before it was ever sacked; although the empire existed in name, the civilization was dead. So too were the seeds of our destruction sown long before the first boat of migrants landed on the shores of Europe.
There is a famous anecdote about Cyrus the Great of Persia. His subjects came to him with a proposal: “Let us . . . depart from the little and rugged land which we possess and occupy one that is better. . . . It is only reasonable that a ruling people should act in this way, for when will we have a better opportunity than now, when we are lords of so many men and of all Asia?” Cyrus told them that they may do so, if they desired, but that if they did they would no longer be rulers, but slaves. “Soft lands breed soft men,” he said “Wondrous fruits of the earth and valiant warriors grow not from the same soil.” Our people have made their lands soft, and have thus grown weak and complacent. We are victims of our own success, in that sense, but that’s nothing to be proud of.
If you are unable, or unwilling, to fight, then foreign invaders will pillage your lands and rape your women. This is, frankly, to be expected, and the morality of it is immaterial. When the great city of Athens was in negotiations with the small city of Melos, their envoys uttered these famous words “Right, as the world goes, is only in question between equals in power, while the strong do as they will and the weak suffer what they must.” Mewling appeals to morality won’t get you far. We can point out the various atrocities committed by Muslim immigrants on European or American soil, but we cannot ignore the real issue: we didn’t stop them. We deem violence to be inherently wrong, raise our children to find it reprehensible, and then we are shocked that other peoples do not feel the same. We fail to instill sexual morality into our women, then act astonished and appalled when foreigners violate them. If barbarians are taking our lands, it’s because they were offered freely.
The point is not that we shouldn’t hate the foreign peoples who now dwell in our ancestral homelands and terrorize our people, but that any approach which does not sufficiently address the fundamental issues of our civilization is pointless. We ought to hate the people who have invaded us, as we would hate any invader, but it is far more important to turn our eyes towards the things that made us weak, and to the people who brought them to our countries. Muslims are not highly represented in positions of power or influence. It is not that they are exceptionally powerful, but that we are less so. We allowed a small minority of people to dictate the social mores and norms of our societies, as we were distracted by the decadence and luxury they provided us with to keep us sated.
Many people seem to dislike Muslims because they are violent, and because they threaten our way of life. But these reasons are invalid. The fault lies not with them, but with us. Our way of life is the reason they are here. It is dysgenic as it is degenerate and immoral. There are a fair amount of supposedly right-wing people whose main objection to Eurabia is “b-b-but our women won’t be allowed to dress like prostitutes!!!” Attacking Islam from the left like this is easy, but ultimately pointless. We ought to hate the ills brought on by modernity and social liberalism more than anything else. Embracing the values which have laid us low and attempting to expel foreign invaders with them is a venture doomed to fail. Instead, we must embrace our tradition, and return to our roots. We must reject modernity and what it has done to us. And it is only after we do this that we will truly be able to reclaim our lands and restore our civilization.
Exposing Antisemitism On The Right
01-06-2016
Donald Trump’s ascendency has lifted the rug on all sorts of ugly elements previously left in the shadows. Violent “Black Lives Matter” members, rioting mestizos attacking police officers outside rallies, and many other incidents have painted the left in a bad light. Seeing such rampant antisocial behavior on the left, one may be inclined to believe the right-wing to be in a better state of things. Unfortunately, this is not the case. Our most recent election cycle has exposed the scourge of antisemitism thriving within Republican circles.
Indeed, there have been a startling amount of anti-Semitic canards pushed in the recent months. Don’t misunderstand, “antisemitism” is quite irrelevant when it comes to drafting policy. Even so, we should remain on guard against bigotry. After all, we know that the Democrats are the real racists. Let’s look over a few troubling tells that anti-Jew sentiment is bubbling up in the sacred halls of Buckley.
A normal, healthily minded person will view Jewish interests as inconsequential. A politician without prejudice will focus on issues that relate to the other 98% of the country. Why would non-Jews have some emotional attachment to those pledging to defend Israel and increase the billions of foreign aid sent yearly to Israel? It’s just a foreign country with no special significance to America.
Being that Jews consist of 2% of the population, one can tell a lot about a person’s prejudices by how they view Jewish influence in America. When a politician goes out of his way to bring up supporting Israel, one must conclude that they are trafficking in the dangerous anti-Semitic canard that Jews have disproportionate influence in the political sphere. It is fair to translate a call to defend Israel at all costs as “You Jews run these elections. You had better make me win now that I am dancing along to the beat of the Zionist task masters.” We must crush such antisemitism wherever we see it.
You might have noticed media figures complain about “racist” cartoons and tweets. Everybody knows not to pay attention to these ridiculously sheltered writers. Unfortunately, ignoring these deranged screeds has led to us missing very important warning signs that the media is also infected with neo-Nazi scum. They claim that hundreds of Jewish media figures are being attacked by vicious words online. This is a very serious accusation. When you unpack the statement, however, another “Jews run such and such industry” dog whistle is exposed.
Jews are only one fiftieth of the population. That means that they are quite rare in the news business. To say otherwise is to claim some sort of ethnic nepotism or conspiracy. When reporters claim that most of the media is under attack by anti-Semites, they imply that Jews run most of the media. Yes, their mendacity is such that they push vile ideas of Jewish favoritism under the guise of anti-racism. These are sick people consumed with hate.
These bigots usually fly under the radar and periodically pop up to push the myth that the Israel and Jewish lobby has a strong grip on American life and policy. We must shut these deranged maniacs down and treat Jews like the insignificant minority they are, not as anti-Christian civilization destroyers that pseudo-intellectual skinheads like Ben Shapiro and Jonah Goldberg would have us believe. We must refuse to allow these Jewish lies be injected into our wholesome Republican party. We will give Jews and Israel a proportional amount of pandering in modern politics (2%), and refuse to allow self-hating Jews to pretend Jews are running our media. It’s what equality driven republicans (like Lincoln and Ronald Reagan) would have wanted.
Don’t be afraid. Call out antisemitism wherever you see it. Whether in the new blog The Daily Wire (pushing the “Jews run the media so we must report on all internet trolling” canard) or the old-guard National Review (sneaking the “Jews run all our policy” canard into most stories), we have a duty to disrupt any place filled with disdain for the small unimportant minority class known as American Jews. No more hate! No more pretending we need to pander to Jews or bad things will happen! We are the party of ideas, not fever dreams of Semitic conspiracy and subversion.
Saracens: Definitely a Problem
02-06-2016
By Keldory
This is a response to Jared Taylor Swift’s article “Islam Is Not The Problem “.
Saracens and their desert mysticism are a problem. Are they THE problem? To even state THE problem in its entirety requires us to phrase it so abstractly it is almost entirely without meaning. No, the doctrine of the Mohametans is not THE problem. But even to speak, or write, this sentence is to prepare a dagger along the spine of Europe and Christendom. That said, I understand the urge to countersignal. When memes about removing kebab have found their way to the eyes of grand strategy game nerds and normies alike, the urge becomes nigh irresistible. The unending social game of being the Most Holy, and thus the Most Correct, is not something unique to the political left. And indeed, if I am beset upon by wild hounds while my hands are restrained, I must free myself before I can deal with the savage beasts. But in such a situation, for another man to come and say “No, those dogs are not your problem. The shackles are really the problem!” is so overly pedantic it becomes suspicious. Who is this man, and why isn’t he even trying to help?
The doctrine of Arabic fanatics known to the world today as “Islam” is a problem for Christendom and her kingdoms. It is a problem for Europe and her children. The doctrine itself as well as the men who propagate it and conquer on its behalf are both issues worth considering separately. There have been many absurd religions that spawned from the lesser minds of desert nomads and jungle fetishists throughout history. That Islam has lasted some 1400 years is proof that it serves some adaptive purpose, even if only for the vicious niche it arose in. Even in the modern world, where its tenants should have become outdated, its influence is ascendant, while the West’s is decadent. It would be foolish not to take it seriously.
Islam is essentially a formalized doctrine of the most base impulses of animal DNA itself, plus some arbitrary false theology to give it the veneer of divine inspiration required of successful religions. Islam says: conquer, consume, and multiply. Our very DNA gives us the same instructions. Solely following these directions ensures man never rises above his most primitive instincts. Thus, we can think of the struggle against Islam as the struggle against our immoral animalistic nature itself. Perhaps even that is not worthy of being labeled THE problem, but we would be wise not to forfeit this battle.
On the other hand, the Saracens threaten the very survival of European people (and their genetics, should one wish to frame it this way) even without the doctrinal quirks of Islam. They are quicker to violence, breed faster, and produce little knowledge of worth to the world, if any. The limited resources of our planet being what they are, any pest left unchecked is at least a potential threat to Earth’s favorite children. Long before Europe and America were throwing millions of dollars at them every year, the Mohametans conquered near half of what had once been the Roman Empire, dealt the killing blow to Byzantium, and pushed into the heart of the Österreich, without even mentioning their conquests and conversions outside Christendom. No other race or world power in history has come remotely close to inflicting this level of damage to European and Christian civilization from the outside. Four of the five capitals of the early Christian world remain in the hands of the Mohametans, and even Europe’s modern capitals are beginning to resemble Mecca more than Rome.
Our hands should not be restrained. Eternal parasites took advantage of the tempering virtues of the crestfallen Europeans in the aftermath of the Germanic wars, turning our leaders into outright traitors while convincing their subjects to lay over and surrender their civilization to foreigners of every other color and creed. Those of us who wish for the survival of European peoples must share the desire to expel or exterminate these rats as well as the dogs they have loosed upon us. However, let us not forget that should we fail to alter Europe’s course, it will be the crescent moon, and not the six-pointed star, that flies over her cities.
This is a response to Jared Taylor Swift’s article “Islam Is Not The Problem “.
There’s no doubt that the left has won the battle of propaganda for the last thirty years or so. Society has been on one long drift towards delusional fever dreams of equality and combination of fundamentally incompatible groups. From both the micro and macro levels, the symptoms of decay are readily observable. From interpersonal relationships to societal connection as a whole, fragmented dysfunction is visible everywhere one looks. Indeed, the left has done well.
In this new reality, diversity is not just a platitude. Children are growing up seeing the social chaos. Whether in the news or in person, most youths have an idea that there is something wrong in the air. If their state run education has done its job, they will be totally unexposed to any socially right wing ideas, such as the unreality of racial (and to a lesser extent gender) equality. They will still observe the dysfunction, but believe marxist social explanations that make little sense.
No, the right must embrace our new reality. We are in hostile territory, yes. We are starting at a disadvantage, yes. That said, media has been democratized to a large extent. Young teens and adults are not spending time in front of the television. They’re using twitter, reddit, and reading chans. All these platforms are easily available to the right.
If the right wishes to succeed in reaching the upcoming generation, we must utilize this new media and completely dominate it. No more half measures. No posting racial graphs and calling it a day. The goal is not to “trigger” those unlucky enough to be brainwashed into the equality cult. No, the goal is to expose them to actual reality. This requires a subtle touch.
For too long, the analytic right has dominated. While their research is invaluable, it’s often conveyed in an ineffective manner. The objective truth is printed starkly, without a human angle. The right must realise that the majority of people are not, by nature, analytical. Humans are quite emotional beings. Women especially, and they make up about half of the voting base, make decisions based on their feelings.
With the emotional nature of the masses in mind, the right must take the cold hard facts and mold them into a highly empathetic – but not untrue – message. The right would do well to emulate the left in this respect. Demonize opponents, stress the future of our children, and socially disincentivize views counter to the chosen narrative. Take every single technique that the left does well, hijack it, and then do it better.
A properly managed message could make women vote for right wing policies for the first time in recent history. All it takes is somebody to properly put forth the idea that left wing ideas will be sentencing the women’s children and loved ones to sure suffering and pain. It’s that simple. Tap into the motherly instinct and turn the opposition into emotional monsters, and you will have your women’s vote.
For the men, it is a bit easier. If they are productive members of society, they will most likely be voting for the right wing candidate anyway. That said, in order to shore up votes, one must be sure to stress the undesirability of left wing policies. Show how they benefit those that do not deserve to be benefited. Target the natural male understanding of justice. Leave them with the impression that voting for the right is the only honorable thing to do.
How To End Police Violence
13-07-2016
Recent events of heartfelt black protest, such as the Dallas BLM march and its ensuing chaos, have shown us that we still have a lot of work to do on race relations in this country. Our disgusting legacy of oppression and unreasonable thoughts of inequality are starkly visible within the police departments near majority black areas. It’s no coincidence that crime rates are reported higher in those zones. Yes, any reasonable person can see that police are manipulating data to reflect their racist agenda of white supremacy and superstructures of hate.
It’s not enough to show solidarity with our dark skinned brothers and sisters as they are hunted down nightly, like a story ripped directly out of The Greatest Game. We must prevent this sick African safari from continuing on. This is modern America, not unmodern America. We should do better, and we will. Why do better? Because we should (and will). That’s all there is to say, really. Here are a few ideas to help prevent pigs (slang for cops which is slang for police officers) from abusing blacks, the most productive group in modern America.
Everybody knows that police suffer from a lack of any accountability. This must end quickly. Assign one black gang member to each unit, so as to give the police a guiding hand that will ensure they do not commit violence. Have them ride along in each squad car, taking notes on the police behavior and recording any rude behavior. Did the police officer look a little too long at a black pedestrian? Did they talk in a tone that evoked memories of lynchings or segregated water fountains? The companion will mark it down. Such disgusting behavior is not to be tolerated anymore.
What’s the biggest problem for average African Americans? Being gunned down by police because they don’t have a weapon to defend themselves. Give members of the black community (doctors, scientists, engineers, etc.) free weapons and concealed carry licenses. Unarmed blacks are being hunted down by white cops on a power trip. Usually these vanilla thugs will tell their friends they’re going “hunting”, and then pop at least five or six chocolate lawyers walking (in an effort to save the environment) home from work. This happens at least weekly. The situation is so dire, that one might even make the case for giving the black community fully automatic assault rifles until the pigs learn to respect the sanctity of colored lives.
While malicious behavior is a large problem, still more “incidents” are the results of poor communication. In black zones, ensure officers first ask “are you breaking the law”, and only proceed with an investigation if a suspect responds in the affirmative. Imagine all the intraracial conflict this could prevent. It’s so simple, and yet the European (KKK White) Pig Complex has never even tried it. As if we needed more evidence of a systematic oppression of noble blacks.
Everybody knows, if a child can’t behave with a toy, a parent will take the toy away. This is why we must take guns away from the most violent population sample: police officers. This will cut down violent interactions between officers and African American citizens by at least 100%. It’s hard for mayo sheriff to go on a rampage when they don’t have the tools to mow down a good boy (who didn’t do anything) selling CDs on the sidewalk. They might still rush little black children for no reason, but the aforementioned FAGPOWER(Free And Good black People Onsite With Excellent Rifles) should quickly teach them to think twice before such acts of racist bloodlust.
Being that no people are perfect (yes, not even the noble black man), justified altercations between police and blacks are bound to happen. In the rare case that the police are in the right, guidelines must be in place that ensure all black individuals know the officer is not a racist. For example, the officer should be required to say the following: “I am not a racist. This is not the result of any melanin based animosity. I enjoyed watching Hamilton, and Obama is a great man. I love blacks.” After hearing this, any black gentleman involved will not resist arrest, but rather meet justice in a peaceful manner and a knowing, wise smile.
With these common sense rules in place, America will see a resurgence of black prosperity. Detroit will bloom once again. Minnesota will become a hub of tourism. We will all be enriched at levels never before seen. Black scientists and writers will return to the forefront of civilization, benefiting us in ways currently unfathomable. Rise up, white man, and free the noble black from their chains.
The Trans Question
22-08-2016
Recently, there has been some needless controversy regarding the acceptance of trans people within the right wing. Beautiful people have been called “mentally ill,” “batty,” “man-handed freakazoids,” and even “proof that G-d either makes mistakes or just really hates us.” These sickening comments dare to make a value judgement, and that’s really just wrong. It’s well past time to set the record straight, and highlight a few of the many reasons that the right should court transgenders.
Transsexuals are a large constituency, and thus an important voting bloc. Take a look at an average family: one mother, one father, one cat, and one child. Chances are, one or two of the family members are trans. It could be the mother, the father, the son or daughter, or the cat, but at least one of these has transitioned. It’s just science. The prevalence of these totally normal individuals means that outreach to them must be done if the right is to remain politically viable.
Transsexuals are in a unique, but healthy, state of mind. Their special outlook on life, having seen modernity through the lenses of both male and female, will be beneficial for the right’s outreach to diverse people groups. Who would a group of older women prefer talking to: a boring housewife with two children and a husband who works a nine to five, or a busty 6’2” blonde with chest and posterior implants, in addition to experience as a high-powered male executive? The females, especially those of the lesbian persuasion (yes, True Conservatives embrace same-sex relationships, bigot leftists), will obviously prefer the latter, more exciting, trans-woman.
Transsexuals play a vital role in any society. Some famous but quietly trans individuals throughout history: Paul the Apostle, Napoleon, Joan of Arc, Aristotle, Adam (from the biblical parable), Tesla, and some historians even suggest George Washington to be of such a persuasion. Clearly, the trans-mind is made of superior material. Where some see “confusion” or “mental instability”, there instead exists a cranium so buzzing with vim and vigor that it would be attractive to any individual even slightly sapiosexual. Trans: they’re not just sexy and empowered, they’re leaders! Who wouldn’t want such a powerful force on their side?
Male to female transsexuals make excellent wives. Due to their former condition (being assigned male at birth by a stupid transphobe doctor), they know what men look for in a woman. This allows them to behave in the best feminine manner possible. After all, what is a woman more than a man with a bigger chest and lots of makeup placed upon the face? Also, since males are better cooks than females, a MtF transsexual will make wonderful souffles and other complicated dishes. The right wing is filled with single men looking for traditional mates, and trans people are ready and willing to get hitched.
The startlingly high suicide rates of trans people (due entirely to bullying from hetero-pigs and not any feelings of despair due to mutilation of the body) may be slightly off-putting, but there exists a silver lining that many seem to miss. The trans community is excellent at tying knots, operating firearms in exciting ways, and writing on sites such as tumblr and reddit. You can’t say that of the average cis male, who instead does boring things like going to work and taking care of family. The diverse range of trans-skills is inspiring!
While the two prior paragraphs may seem unrelated to politics at first glance, they are quite integral. Imagine the near future. It’s election season and a small family gathers around the television set to view a political debate. A commercial pops on the screen, showing a republican candidate: a lovely middle-aged male to female trans-mestizo. She places a cake in an oven, pops a few estrogen pills, and starts polishing a jet black shotgun. Radiating both strength (big powerful gun) and tenderness (tasty cake, pills), she says in a smoky half-man half-woman voice, “I’m with you, citizen. Even if you are a disgusting cisgendered white heterosexual.” After such an endearing display, the election is sure to be won by the right wing in a breathtaking landslide.
A trans person is just like any other person, but better. Transsexuals make up the majority of the population, and the trans lobby has been known to decide elections in the past. Trans individuals have experience living as both genders, which allows them a nuanced view on sex relations. They dominate all leadership fields due to their minds which are constantly abuzz with new ideas and perspectives. Trans women are the solution to low marriage rates within the right wing, being superior to biological females in nearly every way. The aforementioned benefits, combined with their unique interest in potentially life ending activities, makes trans individuals the ideal candidates for the republican party.
Quick take: In Defense of Common Filth
23-08-2016
He criticizes white people. This is good. Whites are not without flaws. After all, when he infers ISIS is superior to whites as a whole , he has a point. Whites have great moral failings. Homosexuality is an accepted part of life in white countries. There are a more than a few instances of whites engaging in bestiality, abusing drugs, neglecting children, and becoming transsexuals.
When you look at ISIS, they’re fighting for what they believe in. As Common Filth knows, ISIS is superior. See, the reports of “dancing boys ”, child rape , sex with goats , and Muslims embracing transsexuality are all myth.
What is the Alt-Right?
30-08-2016
The Alt-Right’s core is based on common sense race realism. The logic is as follows:
Evolution is real, and affects all living things.
Humans, being living things, are affected by the forces of evolution.
The varying human races have been living in differing environments, and have thus been under differing evolutionary pressures.
Differing evolutionary pressures have caused human races to evolve in different ways.
Due to evolution, each unique people group will have different tendencies with regard to hair color, skin color, height, brain function, facial structure, etc.
Informed by the aforementioned knowledge, the Alt-Right soundly rejects the nonsensical idea of racial equality. After all, racial diversity stands out when one looks at the racial breakdown of athletics, academic performance, crime rates, etc. Since different activities select for different traits, certain races will be better (on average) at the activities.
All members of the Alt-Right agree that race is real and the races have different average capabilities and attributes.
The Alt-Right understands that the less cohesion (more diversity) a society has, the more it will experience conflict between differing groups biologically predisposed towards behavior at odds with each other. The Alt-Right understands that more cohesive groups perform better than less cohesive groups.
Race informs biology and biology influences decisions, thus different race shape society differently. Since race shapes society, immigration influences a country.
The Alt-Right is a movement for white people interested in preserving their countries. While there are non-whites sympathetic to the alt-right, they are allies, not members of the alt-right.
The Alt-Right recognizes that jews are an ethnic group that is semitic and not white. While they may look white in many cases, they ultimately act in ways that are to the benefit of their ethnic group and detrimental to white ethnic groups.
The Alt-Right agrees that white countries need to be racially preserved if they wish to remain white in look and culture. This is achieved through sensible race based immigration policy.
The Alt-Right embraces science and thus embraces the differences between the genders/sexes. Since it recognizes the differences between the sexes, the alt-right agrees that men and women should be encouraged towards different behavior that better mesh with their natural proclivities. Women are encouraged to be feminine and start families. Men are encouraged to be masculine and provide.
Being interested in a positive society where unhealthy behavior is minimal, the Alt-Right is against behaviors such as drug use, miscegenation (which introduces further diversity and thus further societal conflict), promiscuity (spreads disease, harms family cohesion), homosexuality and transsexualism (both net negatives on society, health and morality wise). There is some debate within the Alt-Right as how best to minimize these antisocial behaviors. Some prefer shaming, others prefer legal enforcement of standards.
The alt-right is passionately nationalistic, rejecting foreign influence dictating how a country runs itself. A good example: the Alt-Right dislikes Israel’s hold on America’s foreign policy. Each country should look out for its own interest, and that includes white countries like America.
Who makes up the Alt-Right?
Whites of all classes and professions make up the Alt-Right. The Alt-Right is very young and filled with many college students, evidenced by the energy and sense of humor seen within online Alt-Right communities such as twitter.
This explainer will be updated as time goes on.
The Non-Issue of Neoconservative Purges
06-09-2016
As the national election nears, two diametrically opposed visions of the right have been warring with increasing fervor. The old, neoconservative point of view has been under attack from the younger, more energetic Alt-Right. As is to be expected, the neoconservatives are doing their best to retain control of the Republican Party. Unfortunately for them, they are going about the matter in a clumsy way, attempting to cut off the ever-growing influence of the Alt-Right. Neoconservatives like Ben Shapiro and Jonah Goldberg fundamentally misunderstand what it takes to purge people.
Why Are Youtube Commentators So Stupid?
09-09-2016
You’d think that an open marketplace like youtube would allow the cream of the crop to rise to the top, yet every popular vlogger on the site fails to make any important points.
Yes, we know that it would be nice to live in a society where everybody is moral and just. Yes, it’s obvious that the bigger a government gets, the more corrupt and oppressive it will become. OK, what’s your point? Do you have a solution other than wishful thinking that the incentives that create big government will suddenly disappear. Of course not, you haven’t thought that far ahead because you’re incapable of thinking that far ahead.
Surely libertarianism has some nuanced arguments, but nobody on youtube seems to be able to make them. A government that doesn’t allow people to do stuff that doesn’t affect anybody else is bad? Wow, really solid stuff. The mind is really being stretched with such radical concepts.
Take a look at channels like Sargon of Akkad, That Guy T, or Vernaculis. They bloviate on about the same basic concepts that any person with half a brain will already be educated on. Radical feminism is bad. Crazy women saying crazy things will make crazy arguments that are easily refuted. Black Lives Matter is actually racist. Wow! The gender pay gap isn’t real, or else companies would maximize profits by hiring only women. This paragraph summed up the vast bulk of their droning content.
Youtube vloggers don’t bring any new ideas to the table. They belabor basic talking points over and over and over again. Their work is without merit, and frankly is an embarrassment. What a bunch of idiots. They should all be put to work doing menial labor and forced to shut their unfunny autistic traps.
Looking Back On 9/11
11-09-2016
On this fifteenth anniversary of 9/11, let’s take a moment to reflect on the deaths of those who died in the towers. Their last memories perhaps a smoky cubicle with passed out bodies to their left and right, the stench of burning smoke and acrid flesh wafting through the air. Alright, now that that’s done, time to focus on important things in life. Things like appreciating the beautiful bounties of Muslim immigration. Let’s take a look at all the positives that importing Arabs has introduced.
Muslims drive taxis! Sure, sometimes they barely speak English, but who else is going to do drive people around? Remember the pre-1965 world before taxis? Let’s not let the small amount of Muslims who mutilate female genitalia distract from the important things like getting a convenient ride from point A to point B.
Ever had a kebab? You can thank the people over at the local former Church that’s been re-purposed as a Mosque. Waking up to the sound of wailing in a foreign language is a small price to pay for good food that only Muslims are physically capable of making. Perhaps in the future, some way of transferring recipes will be possible, but until then, foreigners are absolutely necessary to create such exquisite dishes such as meat on a stick. Don’t let the desire for a united Western culture make your stomach go empty!
As if all those perks of Muslim immigration into American communities were not enough, there is more to come! It’s only a matter of time until segregated swimming pools are instituted, like the ones now seen in enriched Germany and vibrant Sweden. The forward thinking Muslim men have it right when they grope little girls who obstruct the swimming lanes. If you can’t swim without some ten year old thot asking for it, what’s the point of even getting in the water?
Any sane person agrees that western women have become too sexualized. That is why we must revert to the end of the spectrum and remove all freedom from them. They shouldn’t dress like sluts, so of course they should be clothed in curtains, with little holes for eyes. What better way to enforce this than to import more Muslims? There simply isn’t a better culture to import than Islam’s.
Yes, we can reflect on the past. We can recognize that certain people of a certain religion did certain things which aren’t pleasant. But please, let’s not get carried away and think that we should take action in order to prevent similar occurrences from taking place in the future. It’s not like Muslim terrorism is an ongoing issue that follows Muslims wherever they go. 9/11 happened, but it’s an isolated event. Everybody just move on and accept the new reality of a multicultural utopia, it’s what the hundreds of dead mothers and fathers broiled alive would have wanted. Go out and thank a Muslim today.
Milo: The Not So Dangerous Faggot
26-09-2016
Milo calls himself the “Dangerous Faggot.” While it is true that he is indeed homosexual, what exactly is dangerous about him?
Milo has stated that homosexuals are the creatives of society, the risk takers. How is that dangerous? Society worships the homosexual. The mainstream narrative glorifies sodomites in all forms of media, from the news to Hollywood productions and primetime television. Society says homosexual behavior is good, Milo agrees.
The mainstream narrative is that racists are bad people. Milo also derides racists. Where is the “dangerous” in that?
All across society, a constant message of “be who you are” is broadcast 24/7. Gay pride, transsexualism, and miscegenation are nonstop themes everywhere you look. Milo is a homosexual, extols the virtues of race mixing (homosexual, yet race mixing nonetheless), and recently dressed in drag. Is that counter culture?
Milo’s entire persona is one of excess, from his flamboyant nature to his theatrical bent. The world around us can only be described as sickeningly consumerist. Imbibe, acquire, experiment. There is no contrast to be found in the entirety of Milo’s shtick.
Cultural libertarianism is currently Milo’s political ideology, if you can call it that. At its core is the wish to be left alone to do whatever you want, free from impediment. There’s not much else to it. How is that dangerous? Freedom is not a controversial idea. Its vague, alluring, and pleasant sounding. Not exactly the stuff that causes parents to shield a young child’s eyes and ears.
Milo won’t even go on the most popular Alt-Right podcast, The Daily Shoah , because he fears being confronted by the actual alt-right.
Milo has called the core of the alt-right (TheRightStuff, Daily Stormer, etc.) fringe elements, not representative of the alt-right. Milo has also stated that he’s not a part of the alt-right. If the entirety of Milo is nothing more than a sparkling façade, why should anybody trust him to define a group of people he’s not a part of, whose very actions contradict his claims? Milo isn’t brave or dangerous. He won’t even go on the most popular Alt-Right podcast, The Daily Shoah , because he fears being confronted by the actual alt-right. Instead, he visits pot heads like Joe Rogan, knowing that he’ll just barely be the smartest in the room.
Where is the danger in Milo? Not in his ideology, he has none. Not in his social stances, he stands with modernity. Not in his economic policy, nobody knows what his is. The only “danger” that Milo poses is the possibility that he will continue to misrepresent the alt-right as a soulless movement of social libertines without any long-term goals or aspirations. The alt-right (what is the alt-right? ) is not a hollow vehicle for Milo, as much as he may wish that to be the case.
Milo is not dangerous in any meaningful sense. He rose to prominence on the back of controversy around video games. He apes the posture of that which is actually dangerous: the alt-right . All flash and no substance, the only danger he poses is his function as yet another contact vector for grids.
The Richest Black Neighborhood In America Has A Higher Rate Of Crime Than The Poorest White Neighborhood In America
01-10-2016
As per these sources for the richest black and poorest white areas:http://atlantablackstar.com/2014/01/03/10-richest-black-communities-america/5/ https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/nov/12/beattyville-kentucky-and-americas-poorest-towns
The richest black neighborhood in America has more crime than the poorest white neighborhood in America.http://www.areavibes.com/beattyville-ky/crime/
http://www.areavibes.com/view+park-windsor+hills-ca/crime/
Gay Porn and Children? In Defense of Sargon of Akkad
04-10-2016
People are sharing gay porn with children on twitter. Why? To fight racism, of course. This all started a week ago, when brave Rationalist and egalitarian Sargon of Akkad took issue with being called a “nigger” online. Getting upset about words posted online is a responsible adult reaction, and being a responsible adult imbued with the power of Rationality, Sargon set about by sharing hardcore gay pornography with his followers.
How did sharing images of anuses getting reamed serve to fight racism? Well, it’s quite simple when you think about it. Only a Social Justice Warrior (yuck, irrational!) would take issue at sexually explicit images randomly appearing on their feeds. Who else would have a reaction of disgust? The fact that racists were grossed out at healthy and normal expressions of love (hardcore gay porn) proves that their racism is not only irrational, but also just plain incorrect.
Some might say that Sargon did wrong by sending hardcore pornography to the feeds of thousands of children who follow him. They would be incorrect. After all, it’s the job of parents to keep their kids safe.
When a man on the street exposes himself to a kids on fieldtrip, nobody says the exhibitionist is at fault. The guy with his junk out isn’t a bad person, the parents who let their children go to school are.
Since the posting, I’ve received messages from children who said that they or their younger siblings where disturbed at what popped up on their feed via Sargon’s account (which they followed for his social commentary). One thirteen year old girl even deleted her account and is dealing with fallout from her friends who she suggested follow Sargon. Good for them. These racist bigot thirteen year old girls need to be shown that non-egalitarianism is just unacceptable.
(racists on suicide watch)
If sharing gay porn with children is the price to pay to prove that IQ data, history, evolution, game theory, and Robert Putnam are wrong, then that’s what needs to be done. Only a morally grandstanding public racist who wants to be looked up to in society would say that children shouldn’t be sent gay pornography.
Rationalists care about truth, not the myth of youthful innocence. A few kids are going to be emotionally disturbed, who cares? Racism has been defeated.
Sargon’s great work exposing the logical flaws in the concept of racial diversity cannot be understated. That’s why the deletion of his gay porn stash is so puzzling. This work was his magnum opus, so why did he delete it? He didn’t fall for the “moral” argument regarding the ethics of sharing gay porn with children. Sargon did nothing wrong, so he shouldn’t have removed his hard work destroying racism.
General Thoughts on the Pence vs Kaine Debate
05-10-2016
I’m not really going to go into policy statements, since that is an ineffective use of time, and the general public doesn’t really care about that minutia.
Pence: Talked in a methodical and level headed tone. He seemed steady and very put together. While he didn’t go out of his way to defend Trump, he brushed aside criticism of his running mate as “not true” or “false”, which (while not totally accurate) was authoritative. He looked the part of a VP.
Kaine: Talked in a rapid manner. His body language was very poor, and his face gave off an unlikeable vibe. His general tone was negative, which cast him in a poor light.
Overall, Pence came out the winner, although he did contradict Trump quite a bit on Russia, which wasn’t optimal.
It’s doubtful as to whether any of this will have an effect on Trump or Hillary, as average people aren’t all that interested in either VP pick. There wasn’t any big moment in the debate, so it’ll probably fade into the ether once any interesting story (presidential or otherwise) enters the news cycle.
Donald Trump: Octopus Woman Grabber Freak Sexmonster (Pedophile?)
18-10-2016
November 8th is inching ever closer, with scandals and accusations seemingly punctuating every day. The latest controversy is Donald Trump’s record with women. Could it be that this mild mannered playboy billionaire with multiple ex-wives and a TV show is actually a serial sexual harasser? Well, the media sure seems to think so.
The timing of these accusations may seem strange at first glance, but let’s do a little thinking. Sexual assault is a very important issue. Generally, when people are assaulted, it’s not like they remember. No, they need something big (like the assaulter almost becoming president of the United States) to jarr their memory.
Are the Democrats playing a dirty trick and attempting a cheap shot at character assassination? Of course not. Just like the Clintons have never been known for foul play, the democratic party is well known for honorable conduct. It’s not like this tactic was used on Herman Cain last cycle.
Examining one of the stories, where Donald Trump sexually assaulted a woman during a flight on a commercial plane, is enlightening. Apparently, the arm separating the two mysteriously disappeared shortly before Donald began his “octopus”-like assault on her figure. She resisted and eventually pushed him away, opting to move to a different seat. The uninitiated might ask why she didn’t simply tell him to stop, and why nobody else on the plane intervened or said anything. The people with those questions need to shut up, they’re simply ignorant and don’t understand. Trump is a meanie sexist racist harasser gross man.
There’s a reason Trump’s accusers are all connected to either the democrats or the Clinton Foundation. That reason? Only democrats and the Clintons care enough about women’s issues to empower the fairer sex to stand up to sexual brutes. A lecherous old man like Trump must not be allowed to win, lest all our sisters and mothers and daughters be sexually assaulted by him.
