The Tears of God
Then when Mary was come where Jesus was, and saw him, she fell down at his feet, saying unto him, Lord, if thou hadst been here, my brother had not died. When Jesus therefore saw her weeping, and the Jews also weeping which came with her, he groaned in the spirit, and was troubled, And said, Where have ye laid him? They said unto him, Lord, come and see. Jesus wept. –St. John 11: 32-35
_________________________________
The British good ol’ boy, Boris Johnson, spoke for all liberals around the world and throughout America when he congratulated America for getting “back on track” with Biden. It seems, from my perspective, the height of insanity to earnestly desire to get “back on track,” on a train bound for hell. But of course the liberal swine are possessed by the devil, so when they get “back on track,” they are simply heading home. And they have been heading home for quite some time. In the name of utopia, they are progressing to a world where there is no humanity, which translates to – No Whiteness — to a world of purified Undines:
They are ready to declare, that they do not think two thousand years too long a period for the good that they pursue. It is remarkable, that they never see any way to their projected good but by the road of some evil. Their imagination is not fatigued with the contemplation of human suffering through the wild waste of centuries added to centuries of misery and desolation. Their humanity is at their horizon—and, like the horizon, it always flies before them. The geometricians, and the chemists, bring, the one from the dry bones of their diagrams, and the other from the soot of their furnaces, dispositions that make them worse than indifferent about those feelings and habitudes, which are the support of the moral world. –Edmund Burke
Our Lord, in the midst of mortal pain on the cross, said, “Forgive them, Lord, for they know not what they do.” But can the same be said of the modern liberals? They have almost two thousand years of Christian history before them, they have seen the Word made flesh in their people, and they have rejected the Word made flesh. They have become like unto the Jews who would not listen to the word of God as preached by St. Paul:
Saying, Go unto this people, and say, Hearing ye shall hear, and shall not understand; and seeing ye shall see, and not perceive: For the heart of this people is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes have they closed; lest they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and understand with their heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them. Be it known therefore unto you, that the salvation of God is sent unto the Gentiles, and that they will hear it. – Acts 28: 26-28
The wheel has come full circle; our people who once championed the Word made flesh no longer, “see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and understand with their heart.” They have decided that Christ be not risen, and they must look for another savior to preside over another realm. Christ’s reign of charity must give way to Satan’s reign of merciless cruelty. That is the decree of the new Sanhedrin, the Sanhedrin of Judaized Europeans — the liberals.
I agree with the liberals on the point of contention, but I do not agree with their conclusion. The point of contention is: Did the European people get it right? Was there, at the vital center of their culture, not in the form of a syllogism but in the spirit and the blood, the answer to the riddle of our existence here on earth? I am one with the antique Europeans on that essential question: I believe that the Christ of old Europe, the Christ of the Gospels, was and is the Son of the living God. The liberals came to a different conclusion – they claimed and still claim that Christ did not rise from the dead on the third day. So all that stemmed from that belief must, of necessity, be discarded as false.
In the early 20th century, a whole cabal of writers, the existentialists, arose to lament the fact that we were alone in the universe without a God to call our own. But by the latter half of the 20th century, the liberals had found a new god for the European people. They discovered, so they maintained, a magic deeper than the false magic of Christianity. They discovered cosmic rationalism, which encompasses the new trinity, consisting of the intellect of man, the sacred negro, and science. However, to use the language of Narnia, is there a deeper magic than the liberals’ deep magic, which is the magic of the white witch? Ah, there’s the rub! The philosophers and theologians cannot provide us with a magic deeper than the magic of the white witch. But the European people, the people with hearts of flesh, knew the deepest magic; they knew the Mysterious Stranger who created a realm in ancient Europe. And they knew Him because they understood Him as St. Paul enjoined them to understand Him, with their hearts. St. Paul came to us because he knew we would hear him. What has closed our hearts, in this, the century of European apostasy, to the Savior, the only begotten Son of the Father?
The two greatest proponents of cosmic rationalism were Albert Einstein (see Einstein on Cosmic Religion and Other Opinions and Aphorisms) and George Bernard Shaw (see Back to Methuselah). It was their contention that mankind had three religious stages. The first stage is the primitive, superstitious stage – fear of lightning as emanating from the gods, and fear of all naturally occurring disasters as emanating from the gods that must be appeased by sacrifice. The second stage is an extension of the superstitious stage with a certain added ethical component. That was mankind’s Christian stage. And finally there is the cosmic stage of religion, which can be attained by men of pure intelligence, men such as Albert Einstein and G. B. Shaw. I’m not making this up, those two incredibly superficial, incredibly vain, egotistical maniacs actually believed they had achieved a higher level of existence than our people with the hearts of flesh. And the modern liberals, most of whom have never read Einstein’s or Shaw’s incredibly superficial theories on the new cosmic religion, have absorbed the superficial faith of Einstein and Shaw. We are reminded of Karl Barth’s assessment of Feuerbach, who was also a cosmic rationalist, when we read Shaw and Einstein: ‘We have heard Feuerbach speak, and we have heard something that is nauseatingly, disgustingly trivial.’ Yes, it is superficiality and triviality that keeps Satan’s kingdom of hell on earth in order. If all that is trivial and superficial was not codified into law, there might be an outbreak of depth, and that would be a terrible blow to our new world order in which there must be no depth of thought or feeling.
What is institutionalized superficiality? It is the idea that the new God the Father – man’s abstract intellect (boldly stated in the first Star Trek movie: “We are our creator”), the new Savior – the noble black savage, and the new holy ghost – science, can give us a sustaining vision of God and man that can replace the antique Europeans’ vision of Christ the Lord. What is implicit in the new religion, that the cosmic man of science does not need the Suffering Servant, was made explicit in one of America’s national anthems – “Thine alabaster cities gleam, undimmed by human tears.” Really? Can we so construct our world, our brave new utopian world, that there is no need for human tears? That can only become possible if we build a superficial world in which there are only abstract human beings who belong to nature and nature’s God, the noble black savage. There is no need to weep if a mathematical entity, an infinitesimally small particle of a statistical aggregate, disappears and returns to nature, what we once called death. But there is a great need for tears in the face of death if human beings are created in the image of God. In all of the Gospels, is there any more moving account of Christ’s divine charity, of His loving concern for His people, than that moment when He wept before the tomb of Lazarus? When our tears are joined with the tears of God, we shake Satan’s kingdom of hell on earth to its very core, because in our grief we have torn away the veil of liberal superficiality and touched the heart of the living God, the God who bled for us and who weeps with us.
The culture that our modern conservatives defend is a culture of superficiality presided over by a cabal of sophisters, economists, and calculators, who have no “compunctious visitings of nature” that can deter them from their maniacal quest to destroy every last human being even tangentially connected to the tears-of-God culture of ancient Europe. The liberals must destroy whiteness because they must destroy the Europeans’ faith, their belief that Christ redeemed our tears. Such a faith is heresy to the liberals. They are building a perfect world of alabaster in which there is no need for human tears, and no need for a God of mercy who bled for us and weeps with us; ‘through Him and in Him’ is an anathema to the liberals.
Trump has holed up in Florida and is talking about running again in 2024. Why, if the liberals do not put him in jail before 2024, should we expect a different result than in 2020? Trump and his followers are still so “far from doing harm that they suspect none.” So, again, why should we expect a different outcome if Trump runs in 2024? If we take into account the fact that the liberals are now codifying the process by which Trump was defrauded in 2020, it seems insane to expect good results from elections. But Americanism is a form of insanity.
Almost half of the American populace have given their support to Satan and his minions. They have completely, with malice aforethought, rejected the tears-of-God culture of the antique Europeans. And the rest of the Americans, the timid and confused majority, want to incorporate a new Christ into the cosmic religion of the liberals. They want the abstract intellect of man, the sacred negro and Christ, and they want science. What is wrong with that trinity? It is not a Trinity. You can’t have Christ and the sacred negro as co-saviors. Trump and the white grazers who supported him will always lose to the mad-dog liberals because the mad-dog liberals have an integral faith; they have given their heart, mind, and soul to Satan. They are committed, through the sacred negro, to the kingdom of hell on earth. When you fight to conserve that kingdom by supporting “our troops” who defend the devil’s disciples in the Capitol building, when you defend the rights of Planned Parenthood by condemning the men who bomb their headquarters, and when you condemn white pietas as racism, you are the devil’s own; you are conserving that which must be opposed with fire and sword.
Let me reference two music videos that illustrate the tragedy of the white grazers who try to blend Christianity and liberalism. The first is the Hank Williams Jr. video in which he tells us that “A Country Boy Can Survive.” At first our hearts soar when we hear him issue what appears to be a defiant rejection of liberalism – “We say grace, and we say Ma’am, and if you ain’t into that we don’t give a damn.” He praises young white men who wear Confederate belt buckles and can “skin a buck and run a trout line.” And when he contrasts the decadence of New York City to the country by comparing his friend’s life in New York City with his life in the country: “My grandpa taught me how to live off the land, And his taught him to be a businessman,” we begin to think that finally we have a fitting apologia for the white man. But wait – “Oh what a falling off was there!” When Mr. Williams shows us how his friend in New York City met his death at the hands of a mugger, the mugger is depicted as a white man. Now, one can make the case that there are vicious, murdering whites, and I would agree with you. But are white muggers really the great danger in New York City or any of our cities? No, the video loses all its impact, it fails at the moment of truth, by failing to confront the major heresy of our times – the worship of Satan through the noble black savage. So long as white Christians accept the liberals’ heresy that blacks can do no evil because they are sacred, those selfsame whites will be half-Christian, and half-liberal, and they will never, never be able to defeat the demon-possessed liberal swine.
In another music video called “The Long Black Train,” Josh Turner echoes the half-way house Christianity of Hank Williams Jr. The song, reminiscent of Hawthorne’s short story, “The Celestial Railroad,” depicts a beautiful, long, black train that beckons one and all to take a glorious ride. But of course that long, black train is destined for hell; we dare not take a ride on it. At first, as in the Hank Williams Jr. video, our hearts soar. What a magnificent depiction of the struggle between good and evil that can only be resolved by recourse to our common hope, our Savior Jesus Christ. But there is a tragic sinking in the video. As the train pulls up to two women, one black and one white, the white woman gets on board the train while the black woman remains behind, steadfastly rejecting the devil’s temptation, and then the train speeds on. Now, again, you can make the case that there are blacks who stand with Christ and reject Satan while there are many, many whites (they are called liberals) who reject Christ and embrace Satan.(1) So what is wrong with the video? Why did I know, with metaphysical certainty, when I first saw the video, that the white woman, and not the black woman, would go to the devil? Even in the good whites, the Christians, there is more than just a touch of negro worship, which represents weakness in the face of the enemy. And the liberals always exploit that weakness to destroy every last vestige of the tears-of-God culture of the antique Europeans.
Why won’t the European grazers, who are part liberal and part Christian, go the whole way? Why won’t they stand with the antique Europeans and look on Christ as the beginning and the end, the first and the last? They are in the grip of the white witch, they fear that her deep magic of the abstract intellect, the sacred negro, and science is deeper than Christianity. Her magic, which is the liberals’ magic, is deeper than the wisdom of the theologians. But Christ was not a theologian, Christ wept before the tomb of Lazarus. And St. Paul was not a theologian; he bid us follow the foolishness of God, which is wiser than the wisdom of men. If we place our hopes in theology, we shall fail. If we place our hopes in elections we shall fail. But if we place our hopes in charity, in the tears of God, we shall touch the heart of God and we shall obtain the peace of God in our hearts, the peace that passeth the understanding of pure intelligence. There is a world beyond the superficial empire of Liberaldom. That is our world; we must cling to that world with all our heart, mind, and soul. +
_______________________________
(1) If the Josh Turner video had two white women facing the temptation of the long, black train, and one woman succumbed to the temptation and one did not, the religious message would have been entirely Christian – some reject Christ for the devil and some choose Christ over the devil. But instead we are given a very different message – Christ and the sacred negro are co-redeemers. That is blasphemy, and we must reject such an unholy blending of Christ and the noble black savage.
