Nick Fuentes General

[muttonhead]

thats cause repubs are all pussy niggers and have no fight in them. hence the state of the cuntry

 

[SowiesoGroyp]

https://x.com/i/web/status/1845218956715700279

very based. if nick asked us to pay his legal fees through a fundraiser i'd probably contribute because what these pieces of shit did was a crime against humanity.

 

[MagicHour]

Saw the latest WoodsTown, not good

Since there is no WoodsTown this week I'll add that PT's riffing was very bad in the last episode and that this episode was the most lazy and uninvolved. I also disagree with Keith's anti-supremacist rhetoric. Keith peddles this metaphysical gobbledygook Platonist argument that the plenitude of nations in the world fulfills 'the Good', so it seems he has a moral disagreement with Joel's settler colonialist rhetoric. Keith did not bring up any moral arguments against Joel in the episode, but the ones he did were more compelling, such as,

• the conditions for settler colonialism no longer exist
• the technological gap between us and the Third World has narrowed ("Pakistan has nukes")
• advocating for "our own rights" has greater appeal than Joel's expansionist ideas, especially for a small movement

I only really disagree with the third point. In Mein Kampf, Hitler talked about conquering Russia to achieve 250 million Germans in Europe by the end of the 20th century, and he still secured the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact. And for the record, I at least prefer Keith to Joel, and I have had the same negative opinion of Joel since I first knew of him. If you can't take one look at him and see what he's about, you're NGMI

Adolf Hitler talking about Keith Woods:

 

[MagicHour]

"..."

https://x.com/i/web/status/1732615594313175119

 

[SowiesoGroyp]

we want to develop and beautify and sanctify the entire world and spread ourselves even further beyond the earth if possible
there should be no self-imposed limitations. restraining ourselves... putting ourselves in mental shackles out of some misplaced, invented "morality" is how we got here. i don't think keith seriously believes africa rightfully belongs under the control of incompetent and mentally retarded africans because of made-up abstract concepts, whether liberal or "platonist"

 

[MagicHour]

we want to develop and beautify and sanctify the entire world and spread ourselves even further beyond the earth if possible

Back when Keith was arguing with Joel, he'd always bring up the idea of recreating the British Empire, always in a mocking tone and a tinge of Irish resentment. What is Keith's belief in universal nationalism other than a demand for the preservation and integrity of all peoples on earth?

i don't think keith seriously believes africa rightfully belongs under the control of incompetent and mentally retarded africans

Here certainly does race-bait on Twitter a lot. I don't take him believing that for granted, though. Keith believes in the sovereignty of all peoples as a political principle, and I strongly doubt that Keith agrees with reviving imperialism, certainly not colonialism. At most, he might be fine with African countries being strongarmed by outside powers on the world stage. He certainly wouldn't want to violate the integrity of other peoples' homelands or sovereignty. If Keith can morally oppose Joel's notion of cleansing Eastern Europe for Germanics, he could just as easily disagree with Cecil Rhodes' idea of whites colonizing Africa. Of course, Rhodes held a lot of influence, so the comparison is somewhat unequal. At least that proposal might not have been tactically bad in Keith's eyes.

Frankly, all his talk about Palestine implies he strongly opposes supremacism. If I recall correctly from the last WoodsTown episode, Keith carves out an exception for America/Canada/Australia as nations originally settled by whites. If Westerners today were to colonize say, Africa, though, it would look a lot like the Israeli takeover of Palestine, on account of there being far more Africans today and the narrowed developmental and technological gap between us and them. The only significant difference might be that if we conquered them, it would still be less ruthless than what the Jews do (which I suspect is a result of inbreeding).

Also, if any Western power attempted colonization anywhere today (whether in South America, the Middle East, Southeast Asia, or Africa), they would likely have to contend with opposing Chinese and Russian interests, which would have been unthinkable in the 19th century, which causes me to side with Keith a little.

 

[Slerk]

Friendly reminder keith woods is literally a potato nigger
doesnt get more complicated than that

 

[SowiesoGroyp]

Back when Keith was arguing with Joel, he'd always bring up the idea of recreating the British Empire, always in a mocking tone and a tinge of Irish resentment. What is Keith's belief in universal nationalism other than a demand for the preservation and integrity of all peoples on earth?



Here certainly does race-bait on Twitter a lot. I don't take him believing that for granted, though. Keith believes in the sovereignty of all peoples as a political principle, and I strongly doubt that Keith agrees with reviving imperialism, certainly not colonialism. At most, he might be fine with African countries being strongarmed by outside powers on the world stage. He certainly wouldn't want to violate the integrity of other peoples' homelands or sovereignty. If Keith can morally oppose Joel's notion of cleansing Eastern Europe for Germanics, he could just as easily disagree with Cecil Rhodes' idea of whites colonizing Africa. Of course, Rhodes advocated from a position of influence, so the comparison is somewhat unequal. At least that proposal might not have been tactically bad in Keith's eyes.

Frankly, all his talk about Palestine implies he strongly opposes supremacism. If I recall correctly from the last WoodsTown episode, Keith carves out an exception for America/Canada/Australia as nations originally settled by whites. If Westerners today were to colonize say, Africa, though, it would look a lot like the Israeli takeover of Palestine, on account of there being far more Africans today and the narrowed developmental and technological gap between us and them. The only significant difference might be that if we conquered them, it would still be less ruthless than what the Jews do (which I suspect is a result of inbreeding).

Also, if any Western power attempted colonization anywhere today (whether in South America, the Middle East, Southeast Asia, or Africa), they would likely have to contend with opposing Chinese and Russian interests, which would have been unthinkable in the 19th century, which causes me to side with Keith a little.

how does keith feel about south africa
i think that'd clear things up pretty simply

 

[SowiesoGroyp]

we should be funneling military aid into orania

orania iron dome

 

[$lave]

Loading…

kick.com