The Chat Thread

NARINGENIN

33334
Low rep power
Joined
Dec 12, 2023
Posts
221
Rep Power
126
My dentist says I need to get my wisdom teeth removed and I'm pretty sure it's better to keep
them if you can but there's no way I can know whether he's lying or get out of the appointment :dice:

Do you have any serious cavities or damage to them? Are they impacted? Do you clean them properly? Do you have enough space in your jaw?

If you're fine in all these departments, then I would ignore the dentist.
 

MagicHour

Jewish
0
Disreputable member
Deceased (RIP)
Joined
Jul 27, 2024
Posts
625
Rep Power
-327
Do you have any serious cavities or damage to them? Are they impacted? Do you clean them properly? Do you have enough space in your jaw?

If you're fine in all these departments, then I would ignore the dentist.
I have none of those problems I should epically confront him in his office
 

NARINGENIN

33334
Low rep power
Joined
Dec 12, 2023
Posts
221
Rep Power
126
I have a wisdom tooth I'm getting removed but it's significantly maligned and chipped and even the holistic dentist I went to thinks I should remove it.
 

MagicHour

Jewish
0
Disreputable member
Deceased (RIP)
Joined
Jul 27, 2024
Posts
625
Rep Power
-327
I do not do all of those things :thingken:
 

SowiesoGroyp

yeh
11111
Staff member
Elite rep power
Joined
Nov 30, 2023
Posts
7,687
Rep Power
5,828
the "MAP" meme was dead on arrival because it advocated for the rights of the abusers. pedophilia, if it's ever normalized, will take the form of "child liberation" -- arguing that children should be treated as equal to adults. if children have autonomy on par with adults, then children can "consent."

alternatively to the total normalization of pedophilia by the libtard ideology train vis-à-vis "child liberation," perhaps age gap stigma (insofar as age gaps map onto "power differentials") will eventually replace minor-adult dichotomy-based stigma, which is inflexible and mostly unjustified; people will usually admit the line is arbitrary but "has to be somewhere" when questioned, which tends to require cognitive dissonance and subsequent thought-termination. in this "more rational" development of libtardism, 40 and 20 would be equally as immoral as 18 and 12.

all signs say we continue to drift away from traditional, natural-law-based anti-paraphilia moralism wherein pedophilia is immoral insofar as it is anti-reproductive, constituting revulsion towards the fetishism of the absence of fertility signifiers and secondary sex differences. as such, traditionally, pedophilia was recognized as homosexuality-adjacent. they were overlapping immoralities, sharing the same root, and they were condemnable on similar grounds. the power imbalance "consent ideology" (but children can never consent until their age hits the magic number) taboo-tulpa is basically a retcon for a culture that no longer stones homosexuals to death, which is why it doesn't make any sense.
the MAP meme pedos tried to leverage the part of libtardism that justified homosexuality as moral because it's (allegedly) involuntary/essential against the overwhelming weight of the anti-pedo taboo. but "being gay isn't a choice, therefore it's not wrong" is a pretty outdated, weak, obama-era libtard argument. the obviously "stronger" (more in line with the fundamental tenets of liberalism) argument is simply "people should be allowed to do whatever they want" combined with "everyone is equal"
 
Top