- Joined
- Nov 30, 2023
- Posts
- 7,690
- Rep Power
- 5,828
"Does yours?"
The Chat Thread
- Thread starter SowiesoGroyp
- Start date
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2023
- Posts
- 5,292
- Rep Power
- 3,051
its still up they're getting ready to move
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2023
- Posts
- 3,158
- Rep Power
- 1,741
if trump loses im changing my password to some random shit i wont remember then logging out and never posting ever again dead srs
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2023
- Posts
- 5,292
- Rep Power
- 3,051
i keep seeing people using "to" instead of "too"
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2023
- Posts
- 5,292
- Rep Power
- 3,051
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2023
- Posts
- 7,690
- Rep Power
- 5,828
this is the only possible route by which pedophilia will be destigmatized/normalized under a liberal framework.
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2023
- Posts
- 7,690
- Rep Power
- 5,828
the "MAP" meme was dead on arrival because it advocated for the rights of the abusers. pedophilia, if it's ever normalized, will take the form of "child liberation" -- arguing that children should be treated as equal to adults. if children have autonomy on par with adults, then children can "consent."
alternatively to the total normalization of pedophilia by the libtard ideology train vis-à-vis "child liberation," perhaps age gap stigma (insofar as age gaps map onto "power differentials") will eventually replace minor-adult dichotomy-based stigma, which is inflexible and mostly unjustified; people will usually admit the line is arbitrary but "has to be somewhere" when questioned, which tends to require cognitive dissonance and subsequent thought-termination. in this "more rational" development of libtardism, 40 and 20 would be equally as immoral as 18 and 12.
all signs say we continue to drift away from traditional, natural-law-based anti-paraphilia moralism wherein pedophilia is immoral insofar as it is anti-reproductive, constituting revulsion towards the fetishism of the absence of fertility signifiers and secondary sex differences. as such, traditionally, pedophilia was recognized as homosexuality-adjacent. they were overlapping immoralities, sharing the same root, and they were condemnable on similar grounds. the power imbalance "consent ideology" (but children can never consent until their age hits the magic number) taboo-tulpa is basically a retcon for a culture that no longer stones homosexuals to death, which is why it doesn't make any sense.
alternatively to the total normalization of pedophilia by the libtard ideology train vis-à-vis "child liberation," perhaps age gap stigma (insofar as age gaps map onto "power differentials") will eventually replace minor-adult dichotomy-based stigma, which is inflexible and mostly unjustified; people will usually admit the line is arbitrary but "has to be somewhere" when questioned, which tends to require cognitive dissonance and subsequent thought-termination. in this "more rational" development of libtardism, 40 and 20 would be equally as immoral as 18 and 12.
all signs say we continue to drift away from traditional, natural-law-based anti-paraphilia moralism wherein pedophilia is immoral insofar as it is anti-reproductive, constituting revulsion towards the fetishism of the absence of fertility signifiers and secondary sex differences. as such, traditionally, pedophilia was recognized as homosexuality-adjacent. they were overlapping immoralities, sharing the same root, and they were condemnable on similar grounds. the power imbalance "consent ideology" (but children can never consent until their age hits the magic number) taboo-tulpa is basically a retcon for a culture that no longer stones homosexuals to death, which is why it doesn't make any sense.