As users of this forum, we would be “MindsEyeMagnites”, but what qualities would make one a “subMindsEyeMagnite”?

[$lave]

are smeed and grimm off xitter? are they considered amarnites?

 

[𝓶𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓷𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓮]

bro is shuckin and jivin for amarna

any objective, neutral, well-informed observer will come to the conclusion that ulyths won

 

[𝓶𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓷𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓮]

yung lean groyper, cool nigger groyper, lautrec would all be considered submarnites and all make better posts than a lot of the early amarna stuff

all faggots and gay
mad?

 

[$lave]

you are rambunctious today

 

[𝓶𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓷𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓮]

 

[𝓶𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓷𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓮]

getting mahd would be considered a submemmer trait i suppose

this post made me realise $lave is a submemmer

 

[$lave]

 

[Stiff]

Sticking with the "-ite" motif, the term "MEMonite" is apt because signing up to a forum from social media is clearly anabaptistic, and also it sounds like "Meta Knight" (he has a cool mask and a tornado attack, and is friends with Cirno!?!?)



A "subMEMonite" would be someone who logged in twice because teh MSN millenial forumspeak + butthole was rly funne on Jimbo's stream but now they're just back on Xitter posting "W" and "he cooked" under every groyper clip

 

[Slerk]

Memmers

A submemmer is anyone who is gay or disagrees with me

 

[𝓶𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓷𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓮]

a submemmer would be someone who talks about poopeh bunga and says GUERP without knowing how to properly use angry birds

disgusting little subbies...