Garbage chart for various obvious reasons. Both Aella and Nick are easily in the 130s minimum. BAP, Yarvin, and Land are all being overestimated (BAP is probably the highest of that trio but maxes at 125 or so -- but Land might edge him out.) by virtue of their writing being obscurantist to hide its severe logical flaws and/or lack of originality. Remember: brilliant minds make complex ideas simple and simple minds make simple ideas complex.
Just look at how the chart is compiled. It's a survey for losers who read blogs about HBD (wow you're telling me there's a genetic component to black people being scary to me and maybe shooting me when I walk outside in the city?) "On the quantitative side, the ratings are extremely reliable" speaks to Emil not being very bright, as all this is testing is how people who take rationalist/HBD surveys see other people. Let us think for a second who is taking surveys like this and who they are: Not very accomplished or socially adroit people who most likely see themselves as very intelligent to compensate for being losers in life, hence their interest in HBD and knowledge of figures like Yarvin or Land.
View attachment 4077
To sum it up, this is just how 115-120 IQ people see other people, which is the following: contemporary figures that are similarly middling IQ and equally spergy, they overrate as they overrate their own intelligence; higher IQ people also high in non-traditional successful extroversion (Aella, Nick, Varg, Kanye, Tate, etc.) they underrate because these survey takers quietly -- or not so quietly -- seethe about those people making money and being popular/successful. Garbage chart and garbage methodology. I hate bloggers and their areaders. They should all be arrested and sterilized but none of them leave their house and none of them have sex so that would be a waste of time.