Nietzschean Humanism vs Romantic Racialism

Petty racialists don’t take existential questions seriously enough. They’re right to reject the egalitarian moralizing of the left, but the secular leftist critiques of them are largely correct. Most understand that it’s irrational to have a politics purely based on brute genetic propagation. This is why racialists will try to employ Christianity, or some kind of vague romantic ideal about “greatness” or “excellence,” to moralize the race. The larpy idealism gives off a certain weakness of people with an emotional attachment trying to revive the glory days.

It’s a mistake to filter everything through a petty racialist lens and to see the European problem in terms of tribal competition with other races. The European problem is the human problem. The problem of nihilism—of reevaluating all our highest values, passions, and ambitions in light of scientific materialism. Of redeeming all the old values that have now been smashed and creating new values to justify the future.

Returning to the superstition of petty racial politics is a regression. There is no scenario where white people come together as a race and completely subjugate and exploit all the other races till the end of time. In fact, to even desire this is to still miss the point.

“The problem that I set here is not what shall replace mankind in the order of living creatures (—man is an end—): but what type of man must be bred, must be willed, as being the most valuable, the most worthy of life, the most secure guarantee of the future. This more valuable type has appeared often enough in the past: but always as a happy accident, as an exception, never as deliberately willed.” – The Antichrist

Very few people are even capable of taking on the responsibility of determining the future. Any man who tries to exert power according to his old-world tribal superstition is cut down by the logic and might of the modern individualist humanist. In fact, white European Nietzschean secular humanists have been in control of the world for quite some time. Who can challenge their authority?

When liberal moralists and communists—far-left Jewish feminists—become too hysterical or destructive they get bitch-slapped back in line by Thunderf00t and Sargon of Akkad. When Muslims get too uppity, they get crushed. Christian moralists are not taken seriously. Even Jews can be ridiculed when they become hysterical. Politics ultimately isn’t guided by any kind of moralist or tribalist faction. Politics itself has been turned into a small technical matter where excessive forces cancel each other out over time.

The only question that remains is—what type can be deliberately willed and bred? What capacities should the next generation possess? What should be preserved and thrown away? What judgements, activities, and experiences redeem and justify the best of us?

This is where we get Nietzsche’s explosive optimism and affirmation of the universe—his “harvest.” Removing the seriousness of our values from the past also removes their many limitations, which keep us small. The process of history has not been in vain because it allows us to have a greater consciousness than ever before. We can consciously breed something.

“Companions, the creator seeketh, and fellow-reapers: for everything is ripe for the harvest with him. But he lacketh the hundred sickles: so he plucketh the ears of corn and is vexed.” – Thus Spake Zarathustra

Only rare, mainly European, self-surpassing men have the capacity to answer that question on behalf of humanity. One must be powerful enough and strong enough to be a real humanist—to not look at humanity through a limited moral lens. Secular Jews have contributed greatly to this, but they are still dwarfed by their own petty racialism. They are too reactive and are life deniers. They deny humanism to wage war on the powerful as a form of unhumanist tribal revenge.

I think that even the lowliest, most slavish man on earth should not be denied the right to value his instincts for mischief, exploitation, power, and dominance. Everyone—especially Europeans—has been the victims of foreign imperialistic powers of some kind. All of us have had our old ways of life uprooted by the natural progress of history. Yet we choose not to moralize about those things or deny those aggressive passions within ourselves. Any foreign entity that would deny our humanity is operating from a place of backward tribalism. Only non-Europeans who are strong and daring enough to trust us can share in this humanity.

Humanity will not succumb to the superstition of reactive politics. There will be no communist takeover or Bolshevik extermination of white people. Communist moralists are superstitious reactive brutes that completely fail to represent humanity.

The old, fear-based sense of racial responsibility transforms into a new responsibility for all of humanity. We few are the only ones with the conscious capacity to surpass our animal superstition and be responsible for humanity. We pass the baton through history and breed a new generation that embodies this further. All of this is embodied in the symbol of Dionysus. Dionysus is the embodiment of Europe. Dionysus is the representative of all humanity.