Capitalism & The Commodification of Identity
Introduction
It is common for many who enter the world of dissident thought to adopt a reactionary stance against Socialism, particularly in the Anglosphere and America. This is often due to them associating the ideology with globalization and modern “woke” ideology. Whilst there is some truth to this due to a lot of ideas that inspired the Sexual Revolution and Civil Rights originating from Marxist thinkers. This notion of capitalism in any way being a bulwark against these movements falls apart once you understand the history of private sector funding of these movements and Marxist theory. This reveals the true nature of the current regime. The purpose of this article will be to provide clarity to many well meaning Nationalists who still have a Stockholm syndrome like support for the very system that has stolen their future from them.
Due to proximity to older generations in the Conservative sphere of thinking, younger generations adopt a rose-tinted view of the past. It is true that overtime there has been radical degradation of societal norms around the turn of the new millennium, but this is nothing more than the bloated corpse of Western Civilization floating to the surface. To effectively resolve the issue you have to with clarity diagnose the root cause, this will come at the expense of right wing dogma which dominates the minds of the newly initiated.
Capitalism as a Stage of Revolution
The root cause of this rot is individualism, the axiom of individual liberty and sovereignty above all else, is the foundation of Social-Liberalism. You will see in the rhetoric of many Marxists the same fundamental presuppositions about human nature and normative claims. This convergence is due to Marxism espousing a progressive view of history, rooted in Dialectical Materialism. Marx views liberalism as the synthesis of the dialectical tension between the aristocracy and the bourgeoisie.
The bourgeoisie overthrew the aristocracy, and resolved the contradictions of the previous system via a meritocratic palingenesis of society. This is the foundation upon which liberalism and capitalism are built. Marx views the bourgeois revolution as the birth of the urban proletariat, arising from the industrial development unleashed by the now unrestrained bourgeoisie and their expansion of productive forces. He would become an advocate for radical free trade and laissez-faire capitalism, as a force to bring about radical globalization and thus class identity. Both Marx and Lenin affirm this, Lenin warns about the nationalistic and patriotic tendencies of socialists and condemns it. They oppose capitalism only as a lower stage of historical development, not due to any kind of opposition to decadency or cosmopolitanism.
“Moreover, the protectionist system is nothing but a means of establishing large-scale industry in any given country, that is to say, of making it dependent upon the world market, and from the moment that dependence upon the world market is established, there is already more or less dependence upon free trade. Besides this, the protective system helps to develop free trade competition within a country. Hence we see that in countries where the bourgeoisie is beginning to make itself felt as a class, in Germany for example, it makes great efforts to obtain protective duties. They serve the bourgeoisie as weapons against feudalism and absolute government, as a means for the concentration of its own powers and for the realization of free trade within the same country.
But, in general, the protective system of our day is conservative, while the free trade system is destructive. It breaks up old nationalities and pushes the antagonism of the proletariat and the bourgeoisie to the extreme point. In a word, the free trade system hastens the social revolution. It is in this revolutionary sense alone, gentlemen, that I vote in favor of free trade.”
– Marx delivered this address before the Democratic Association of Brussels, 9 January, 1848.
“The class-conscious workers fight hard against every kind of nationalism, both the crude, violent, Black-Hundred nationalism, and that most refined nationalism which preaches the equality of nations together with … the splitting up of the workers’ cause, the workers’ organisations and the working-class movement according to nationality. Unlike all the varieties of the nationalist bourgeoisie, the class conscious workers, carrying out the decisions of the recent (summer 1913) conference of the Marxists, stand, not only for the most complete, consistent and fully applied equality of nations and languages, but also for the amalgamation of the workers of the different nationalities in united proletarian organisations of every kind.”
-Lenin in Corrupting the Workers with Refined Nationalism
Combining contradictory tasks—patriotism and socialism—was the fatal mistake of the French socialists. In the Manifesto of the International, issued in September 1870, Marx had warned the French proletariat against being misled by a false national idea[2]; the Great Revolution, class antagonisms had sharpened, and whereas at that time the struggle against the whole of European reaction united the entire revolutionary nation, now the proletariat could no longer combine its interests with the interests of other classes hostile to it; let the bourgeoisie bear the responsibility for the national humiliation—the task of the proletariat was to fight for the socialist emancipation of labour from the yoke of the bourgeoisie.
-Lenin Lessons of the Commune
Depopulation & The Corporate Construct of Faux-Identity
Marx is very clearly stating a supportive view of Capitalism specifically Free Trade & Laissez-faire, he recognized the destructive and revolutionary potential of Capitalism as a force for the destruction of traditional family structure and national identity. Even from an Anti-Communist lens it becomes an indefensible position. This is further substantiated by the private sector being one of the main forces for spearheading aspects of DEI and Social-Liberalism alongside Marxists, going back as far as the 30s with The Rockefeller Foundation and affiliated organizations have funded various initiatives to promote Feminism such as allocating a substantial grant of $350,000 (equivalent to around $5.6 million today) to establish the Women’s College of the University of North Carolina, emphasizing a clear ideological commitment to gender egalitarianism in education. In 1970 the Rockefeller Family Fund awarded a grant to National Organization for Women, a grant of $15,000 (approximately $100,000 today) in support of advocacy for gender equality and women’s rights.
In 1952 The Population Council was established by John D. Rockefeller, which focused on “reproductive health and family planning” as tools for depopulation, out of fear that the baby boom would create an overpopulation crisis. Books like Paul R. Ehrlich’s bestseller The Population Bomb (1968) played an essential role in promoting depopulation among the general public and academia. He predicted that scarcity caused by the population boom would create catastrophic effects due to food insecurity. The first sentence declaring “The battle to feed all of humanity is over.” And humanity had lost. In the 1970s, the book predicted, “hundreds of millions of people are going to starve to death.” No matter what people do, “nothing can prevent a substantial increase in the world death rate.”
Demographers and other population experts in the West had long held these fears. They had made it their mission to reduce the birth rate in developing countries through the distribution of contraception and sterilization programs. Population experts at The World Population Conference were optimistic about the waning of conservative attitudes about contraception and a shared acceptance of the dangers of overpopulation — at least in the US and Western Europe — they expected to secure support for zero-population-growth initiatives. The popularization of feminist thought inspired Edward Bernays, he combined his uncle Sigmund Freud’s Psychology with mass communication, he believed that the masses could be controlled by appealing to their unconscious desires and emotions.
Bernay’s viewed the feminist movement as a new market to be tapped into, collaborating with Lucky Strike he engineered the first high profile campaign utilizing gender identity as a means to expand the consumption of cigarettes to women. Who had recently gained voting rights with the phrase “Torches of Freedom”. Aviatrix Amelia Earhart became the face of Lucky Strike cigarettes in 1928, claiming to have smoked Lucky Strikes on her flight from Canada to England. The copy of an advertisement at that time said, “Lucky Strikes were the cigarettes carried on the ‘Friendship’ when she crossed the Atlantic. They were smoked continuously from Trepassey to Wales. I think nothing else helped so much to lessen the strain for all of us. This was the prelude to using manufactured identity as a means of creating new artificial consumer identities to market to.
The Origins of Queer Theory & it’s Application in Social Engineering
Feminism was key in undermining gender roles and making men and women interchangeable and debased to being solely economic units, the equality of sexes logically concludes to their teleology being interchangeable. Queer theory asserts that gender and sexual orientation are a product of societal norms, even going so far as to advocate the liberation of pedophiles. We can see that radical Marxism and the Oligarchy play a symbiotic role in the subverting sexual morality and creating hedonistic identities.
“The individual is no doubt a reality, a reality fabricated by this specific technology of power that I am trying to describe.”(The “individual” — and by extension, the category “child” — is not simply natural but “fabricated” through institutional power.)
— Discipline and Punish (1975), p. 194
“Sexuality must not be thought of as a kind of natural given … It is the name that can be given to a historical construct.”
— Michel Foucault, The History of Sexuality, Volume 1“There is no gender identity behind the expressions of gender; that identity is performatively constituted by the very ‘expressions’ that are said to be its results.”
— Judith Butler, Gender Trouble
The pioneer of Transgender research Magnus Hirschfield, the Jewish Sexologist founded The Scientific-Humanitarian Committee in Berlin (1897) it was the first LGBT Rights organization in history, which advocated for social recognition of homosexuality and transgenderism and against their legal persecution. Their main focus was campaigning for a relaxation of laws against homosexuality. One of its principal objectives was to remove Paragraph 175, which criminalized ‘intercourse-like’ activity between men, from the German Imperial Code. Despite the praise from the current regime, it failed in it’s objective of lifting persecution and he Institute for Sexual Science in (1919) was one of the main targets by the National Socialists due to it hosting a multitude of degenerate services, including the first surgical sex changes in modern history, abortions, lectures and ‘sex counseling’, room rentals, a large library of pornography and erotic literature on every possible perversion (including bestiality and pedophilia), and a Museum of Sex featuring a wide array of homosexual fetish items, dildos, “masturbation machines” and many other horrors which are unfortunately becoming common place in contemporary culture.
The institute hosted tens of thousands of visitors each year, including school class field trips. Hirschfeld was a notorious transvestite, popularly known in the Berlin gay scene by his cross-dresser alias Tante Magnesia. His donors were largely private individuals who held Progressive, Liberal and Marxist views though the names of his donors were destroyed by the National Socialists during the raids. The most we have is In his autobiographical works such as “Men and Women: The World Journey of a Sexologist” (1933)—Hirschfeld occasionally alludes to financial challenges and support, but he is discreet about naming individuals. He does mention fundraising efforts and gratitude to private supporters, especially during his world tour (1930–32) and exile. Several historians (e.g., Laurie Marhoefer, Ralf Dose) have noted that the Institute received backing from liberal and progressive circles in Berlin, including some wealthy Jews, doctors, and artists sympathetic to Hirschfeld’s mission. He was a close associate of Albert Einstein and Anita Augspurg, a feminist jurist and early supporter of women’s rights, was sympathetic to Hirschfeld’s work.
Early investment in transgender research and advocacy came largely from private philanthropic organizations, especially starting in the 1990s and early 2000s, when public funding and institutional support were minimal. These funders played a critical role in developing the academic, medical, legal, and cultural infrastructure that supports trans rights and knowledge production today. The first being Reed Erickson and the Erickson Educational Foundation (EEF), established in 1964 by the Jewish transgender activist and entrepreneur. The EEF was instrumental in supporting early transgender research and initiatives. It provided funding for the creation of the Johns Hopkins Gender Identity Clinic and the Harry Benjamin Foundation, both of which were central to early transgender medical research.
John Money was a New Zealand-American psychologist, child abuser and sexologist, best known for his work on gender identity and sexual behavior. He played a significant role in the development of transgender research, particularly through his establishment of the Johns Hopkins Gender Identity Clinic in 1965. He introduced and popularized the terms “gender role” and “sexual orientation,” emphasizing the distinction between biological sex and gender identity. He believed that gender identity was primarily learned and could be shaped through socialization, particularly during early childhood. This perspective led him to advocate for gender reassignment in cases where children were born with ambiguous genitalia or experienced traumatic injury, as in the case of tragic case of child abuse of David Reimer at the hands of Money. who was born male but raised as a girl after a botched circumcision. Money recommended the reassignment, believing that gender identity could be successfully altered through Reimer struggled with his gender identity throughout his life, leading to severe psychological distress and ultimately suicide at age 38.
The Open Society Foundations (OSF) founded by the Hungarian-Jewish billionaire and investor George Soros named after the concept coined by the Austrian Jewish Philosopher Karl Popper. The fundamental worldview of Karl Popper’s Open Society is rooted in rationalism, individual freedom, and political fallibilism. At its core, it is a rejection of authoritarianism and ideological certainty, and an embrace of critical thinking, democratic accountability, and human dignity. The Open Society Foundations works globally to promote “democracy, human rights, and social justice” Which are all of course, hollow buzzwords for the expansion of American oligarchic hegemony and Social-Liberalism. While OSF funds a broad range of issues, it has made significant investments in LGBTQ+ rights, including transgender issues, particularly since the 1990s and early 2000s being one of the early large foundations to recognize transgender rights as a distinct and critical human rights issue, and supporting prominent organizations such as the National Center for Transgender Equality and the International Trans Fund.
The Arcus Foundation founded by Jon Stryker a “philanthropist” and architect. The Arcus Foundation was established with the explicit goal of advancing LGBTQ+ rights and “social justice”, alongside global conservation efforts. It is widely recognized as one of the first foundations to dedicate substantial funding to transgender ideology, research, and advocacy. Arcus has been one of the main forces for spear-heading support for organizations and research focused on social-engineering worldwide. The foundation funds work that addresses issues like legal gender recognition, healthcare access, anti-discrimination policies, and social engineering to change public opinion of transgender people. They are one of the main contributors through grants to academic research and policy development. Arcus’s funding helped seed many early initiatives that changed public perspective on transgender issues, supporting organizations like the Transgender Law Center and Global Action for Trans Equality, Arcus began focusing on transgender issues from its inception in 2000, growing its portfolio in LGBTQ+ grantmaking over the decades. The foundation has explicitly stated its commitment to advancing “gender justice”, recognizing the intersections of race, class, and gender identity.
Private Sector Lobbying for Mass-Migration
“The need of a constantly expanding market for its products chases the bourgeoisie over the whole surface of the globe… It compels all nations, on pain of extinction, to adopt the bourgeois mode of production.”
— The Communist Manifesto (1848), Marx and Engels
The Open Society Foundation a name we are all familiar with by now, is one of main private sector forces globally for promoting open borders and economic globalization. Their main goal is funding and lobbying for: Refugee rights, legal support for migrants, border monitoring and anti-deportation campaigns. They were a prominent private sector force, active in supporting asylum seekers during the 2015 European migration crisis, which has led to Europe being plunged into barbarism due to the resentment migrants from largely ex-colonial nations, hold towards Europe. Facilitating the largest genocide ever seen in the history of mankind. The OSF Supports legal challenges against anti-immigration policies in Hungary, the U.S., and other nations pursuing tough border policy. Popper criticized societies that prioritized collective identity over individual rights, categorizing to them as “closed societies.” He affirmed that open societies should encourage individual responsibility and critical thinking, moving away from rigid traditionalism.
“A closed society is based on absolute truths and authoritarian rule. An open society respects diverse opinions, accountability, and the rights of all.”
— Paraphrased from Soros
Industrial and corporate interests pushing for more immigration go all the way back to the late 19th century to early 20th century, due to the nature of growing monopoly capital having separate interests from the nation state. One of the earliest being railroad companies, land speculators, Industrial manufacturing interests and the urban political machine incentivized by the votes of naturalized immigrants. This led to a major backlash from the mostly Anglo-Saxon stock of America, and culminated in the rise of the Nativist Movement and labour unions reacting against private forces undermining the national interests of the collective for their own gain.
The Hart-Celler Act was the final nail in the coffin of America, it uprooted the foundation of what built America it’s racial stock. It reduced a great nation to an economic zone and established the modern framework for legal immigration, centered on family reunification and skilled labor. This dramatically altered the demographics of the nation which they had promised it wouldn’t.
“This bill is not a revolutionary bill. It does not affect the lives of millions. It will not reshape the structure of our daily lives.”
(Senate floor speech, 1965)
Kennedy later admitted that these predictions were wrong. But at the time, he and others downplayed the expected demographic effects to ensure the bill’s passage.
The policy was supported and influenced by the Ford Foundation by funding academic research, that challenged the national origins quota system as “discriminatory and outdated”, alongside sponsoring pro-civil rights research that believed that immigration reform would bolster the cause of civil rights and broader racial justice goals, this is them directly admitting that demographic replacement is key to undermining the institutional power and ability for White Americans to organize politically in favor of their interests. The Brookings thinktank to publish policy papers and expert testimony that the current immigration policy was harmful and economically inefficient. Universities such as Harvard University received funding for their Department of Social Relations and Graduate School of Education, scholars in these departments such Harvard sociologist Nathan Glazer, co-authored of Beyond the Melting Pot with Daniel Patrick Moynihan, which emphasized the endurance of ethnic identity in American life—undermining assimilationist arguments used to justify national origin quotas. Ford funded projects in the Committee on Human Development and the Sociology Department. These included urban ethnic studies and immigrant integration patterns in American cities. The Ford Foundation also funded research from Columbia University, University of California, Berkeley and Yale University alongside those listed above.
Other funders of research that influenced the policy was the Carnegie Corporation which supported scholarship promoting pluralism and integration, which questioned assimilationist fears and supported more inclusive immigration, the Russell Sage Foundation which funded ethnographic and sociological studies on immigrant life in cities, highlighting the contributions of immigrants, the Field Foundation which supported civil rights groups and public campaigns and promoted African American leaders, clergy, and progressive politicians who drew explicit connections between civil rights and immigration reform. The Council on Foreign Relations While not centrally involved in immigration, CFR members and publications argued that racialized quotas undermined U.S. credibility abroad in newly decolonized nations. This Strengthened the Johnson administration’s case that reform was necessary for America’s global leadership and ideological consistency.
Contemporary Immigration lobbying is a spiderweb of many different interests in the private sector, in the past it was largely industrialists and rail companies; now silicon valley which was hyped up a great career option for ambitious, cerebral White men, has been one of the main lobbyists in favor of the H1-B visa program. FWD.us (Forward Us) is an advocacy organization based in Washington D.C. established in 2013 as a “social welfare” non-profit, it functions as a traditional charity and a a PAC—able to lobby, spend on ads, and influence policy without direct candidate endorsements; it’s core mission being immigration reform such as support for illegal immigrants, DACA recipients and expanding visas (especially H‑1B STEM categories). FWD.us is one among many private lobbyists advocating for more immigration with others such as Compete America, is a broad coalition of companies and universities for reform to promote “high skilled immigration”, National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) which supports both high- and low-skilled immigration to address labor shortages (despite companies laying off millions of workers in favor of cheap immigrant labor), American Farm Bureau Federation supporter visa programs for seasonal and agricultural labor (H-2A), National Restaurant Association which lobbies for looser immigration rules for service industry labor and finally of the most powerful lobbies The US Chamber of Commerce, which advocates for more immigration reform across sectors.
Civil Rights, Ethnic advocacy and religious organizations such as: U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) which advocates a strong pro-refugee and immigrant rights platform, Evangelical Immigration Table, Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service (LIRS), National Immigration Forum, American Immigration Council, National Council of La Raza (UnidosUS) which advocates for Latino immigrants, sian Americans Advancing Justice (AAAJ) Center for Migration Studies and of course HIAS (formerly Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society) advocates for refugee resettlement. Founded in 1881 in New York City to support Jewish immigrants fleeing persecution in Eastern Europe. Over time, it became a pioneering force in refugee resettlement, a nonprofit headquartered in Silver Spring, Maryland, HIAS claims to focus on “rescuing people whose lives are in danger, aiding the most vulnerable refugees, facilitating family reunification, and advocating for refugee rights”. Their influence now goes beyond the US and is now a global organization operating via offices in 22 countries, ranging from humanitarian aid and counseling to legal representation and refugee resettlement. It was instrumental in advocating for the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 (Hart-Celler Act), helped enable the Refugee Act of 1980, which standardized U.S. refugee procedures and established a modern resettlement infrastructure and Supporting Soviet Jewish Emigration from the late 1960s onward, HIAS aided over 400,000 Soviet Jews in immigrating to the U.S., Canada, Israel, and other nations.
Even Labor Unions which historically opposed immigration are prominent lobbyists in favor of immigration such as the AFL-CIO which is a federation of 15 million members, with a strong pro-immigrant stance, supports legalization, rights, path to citizenship and opposes restrictionist bills. SEIU 1.9M members in healthcare, public service, janitors, foodservice, which organizes immigrants, leads protests against workplace raids and advanced immigrant inclusion, Unite HERE / Culinary Workers (Hospitality, hotels, casinos, airports) which defends immigrant worker rights and pushes back against enforcement, LCLAA (within AFL-CIO) which is a Latino constituency group active in lobbying for immigrant rights and policy at both federal and state levels.
Conclusion:
Tying back to the Marx quote we can see that he was correct in his praises of Capitalism undermining national sovereignty and creating a new a globalized world economy, where people are uprooted, though his belief that we would adopt class identity was not; Socialism can only exist within the context of the nation. We can see this actualized in the private sector being a significant force for the promotion of mass migration, the tentacles of money stretch across the globe. It is no mystery why the enlightenment bourgeois revolution was the perfect environment for the Jew to create the world in his vision (Tikkun Olam). Only a state that is sovereign from internal and external influence that consolidates power into a cohesive whole can guarantee a future for our race. The basis of the state cannot be divorced from the nation and the nation cannot be divorced from the core ethnos that makes up its unique character, it is the immutable biological characteristics that make up the differences between peoples. A nation founded purely on abstract concepts is not a nation at all when this logic is taken to it’s ultimate conclusion, where the population is made up of rootless hedonistic consumers with no sense of duty to those around them; whose only incentive to society at large is personal gain and the closest they have to a sense of community is their immediate family, even that is not beyond being profaned via the promotion of homosexuality. Many socially conservative minded people will never be able to have any effective victory until they understand the teleology of Liberalism and how it inverts the natural order.
A country has the Jews it deserves. Just as mosquitoes can thrive and settle only in swamps, likewise the former can only thrive in the swamps of our sins.
— Corneliu Zelea Codreanu
